Fwd: WEBINAR 2pm ET Thu Aug 6 - drugdocs: Using RDF to produce one coherent, definitive dataset about drugs - Yosemite series part 3

FYI Forwarded Message WEBINAR: drugdocs - Using RDF to produce one coherent, definitive dataset about drugs- Conor Dowling (Part 3 of Yosemite Series) DATE: Thursday August 6, 2015 TIME: 2 PM Eastern / 11 AM Pacific ATTEND LIVE - Google Hangouts On Air: https://goo.gl/N4vC3

Re: ACTION: Lloyd to ask James and Ewot about the underlying precision retention of xsd:decimal values

On the Java side, parsing and encoding of FHIR primitives into XML is all hand rolled, so no xs:decimal. I'm not sure what the concern is, but if there are any specific areas of concern I'm always hunting for new unit tests... James On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Paul A. Knapp wrote: > Are eit

Re: ACTION: Lloyd to ask James and Ewot about the underlying precision retention of xsd:decimal values

According to the spec, Json/Javascript numbers are 64 bit floats (IEEE 754) . Out of the box I would suspect that most libraries do not preserve precision since floats don't. Most libraries I've worked with at least have workarounds though t

Re: ACTION: Lloyd to ask James and Ewot about the underlying precision retention of xsd:decimal values

Hi David, Precision is preserved in JSON as well. Needing to behave consistently across encodings was actually the main reason for rolling our own primitives. Cheers, James On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:29 PM, David Booth wrote: > Hi James, > > What about for FHIR JSON? Would 1.200 in FHIR JSON s

CfP - ONTOLOGY ALIGNMENT EVALUATION INITIATIVE (OAEI) 2015

CALL FOR PARTICIPATION - ONTOLOGY ALIGNMENT EVALUATION INITIATIVE (OAEI) 2015 --Apologies for cross-posting-- Since 2004, OAEI has been supporting the extensive and rigorous evaluation of ontology matching and instance matching techniques. In 2015, OAEI will have the following tracks ( http://oa