Re: FHIR on schema.org

2016-05-29 Thread Renato Iannella
> On 28 May 2016, at 00:56, David Booth wrote: > > It seems to me that privacy needs to be addressed at the level of protocols > and policies. What are you suggesting relevant to vocabularies, such as > schema.org? I am raising the concern that the FHIR vocabulary includes personal/private

Re: FHIR on schema.org

2016-05-29 Thread Renato Iannella
> On 27 May 2016, at 17:31, Marc Twagirumukiza > wrote: > > Some of your thoughts need a deep discussions. Can you attend one of ScheMed > or FHIR RDF group meetings and raise such points? This will allow to > associate other's views as well. Timezones are usually the problem. Great if you