Best IRI for the term "probe"

At present, I'm planning to go with dcterms:subject and "macromolecular probe" (from the Biological imaging methods ontology) like this: <http://identifiers.org/affy.probeset> <http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject> <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/FBbi_0410&g

Re: linking a symbol with a dataset

To follow up, it appears the decision reached regarding linking a symbol with a dataset is to add two new terms to SIO: * http://semanticscience.org/resource/has-data-item * http://semanticscience.org/resource/is-data-item-in Anders Riutta - Original Message - > From: &

Re: FHIR as JSON-LD? [was Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)]

This should be possible, because one of the key design objectives for JSON-LD is to allow existing JSON to be interpreted as Linked Data with zero edits to the JSON document, most of the time (paraphrasing from [1]). Anders Riutta [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#design-goals-and-rationale

Re: linking a symbol with a dataset

The property "hasPart" for schema:Dataset [1] doesn't have the problem with disjoint type, as long as you consider a protein a "CreativeWork". Anders Riutta [1] http://schema.org/Dataset - Original Message - > From: snachimu...@mmm.com > To: "Vladim