Hi,
Just a quick comment. We used to have a Semantic Web / BioPAX workgroup, which
probably partially overlaps with the intentions of the W3C Sys Bio Group. The
workgroup has been stale for a while, essentially because of a lack of time
from who was supposed to organize it... but we just had so
Hi,
probably there is not much difference. But with Semantic Web data, insight into
the structure of data is more of a key, as you don't have "schemas".
If I query a database, I would look at tables to understand a structure. If I
look a at a Semantic Web knowledge base, perhaps visualization is
i know have
> built strong support and applications. elsevier and deri were sponsors
> also.
>
> cheers,
> michael
>
> Michael Miller
> Software Engineer
> Institute for Systems Biology
>
> [1]: http://semtech2011.semanticweb.com/
>
>
>
mantic web technology,
but bear in mind that Watson is more a cleaver example of NLP.
An interesting question, how to make the case for semantic web technology.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Andrea Splendiani (RRes-Roth)
mailto:andrea.splendi...@rothamsted.ac.uk>>
wrote:
Hi Oliver
hing
> more formal.
>
> Best,
>
> - Anita.
>
> Anita de Waard
> Disruptive Technologies Director, Elsevier Labs
> http://elsatglabs.com/labs/anita/
> a.dewa...@elsevier.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrea Splendiani (RRes-Roth)
>
Hi Oliver,
I think it's hard to find this form of "breakthrough evidence" and this may
even be counterproductive to convince people.
If you present a high-level, breakthrough result (say, we save lives), than you
leave two open questions:
- how much of this is dependent on the computational supp
Sorry, what's the AAA principle ?
It seems to me ignoring is not a problem. In case, thinking that you don't
ignore anything is against the SemWeb framework.
Ciao,
Andrea
-Original Message-
From: public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org] On Beha
Hi,
What is "meaning" for you ?
For what comes to my mind, either you consider an explicit set of statements,
and then this device will be pointless. Or you consider something that carries
some information, and this rule out almost only white noise.
What do you have in mind ?
Ciao,
Andrea
Looks good to me...
Ciao,
Andrea
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Samwald [mailto:samw...@gmx.at]
Sent: 22 June 2009 14:44
To: Alan Ruttenberg; Hilmar Lapp
Cc: eric neumann; andrea splendiani (RRes-Roth); w3c semweb HCLS
Subject: Re: Any meeting at ISMB ?
If there is still interest in
Hi, thanks.
But which is the difference between this, and using sparql on top of an
inferential model ?
Ciao,
Andrea
-Original Message-
From: public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Pierre LINDENBAUM
Sent: 27 February 2009 10:02
To
Thanks. I've been looking for it, but I was not sure the Taxonomy was
inside... and I was trying with different URIs...
Ciao,
Andrea
-Original Message-
From: Melanie Courtot [mailto:mcour...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 February 2009 20:29
To: andrea splendiani (RRes-Roth)
Cc: public-s
Thanks!
It'2 240M, but compressed is only 9.
I wonder whether there is some architecture to transparently transfer
compressed ontologies...
Ciao,
Andrea
-Original Message-
From: Chris Mungall [mailto:c...@berkeleybop.org]
Sent: 25 February 2009 20:53
To: andrea splendiani (RRes
ere.
Ciao,
Andrea
-Original Message-
From: Erick Antezana [mailto:er...@psb.ugent.be]
Sent: 25 February 2009 20:51
To: andrea splendiani (RRes-Roth)
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci hcls; Vladimir Mironov; Martin Kuiper
Subject: Re: Is there an NCBI taxonomy in OWL ?
Hi Andrea,
you can fi
13 matches
Mail list logo
