Re: LSID lookup details: help? [was: All about the LSID URI/URN]

2006-07-31 Thread Benjamin H Szekely
Ben Szekely IBM Software Engineer Advanced Internet Technology, Cambridge, MA [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/31/2006 10:57:30 PM: > > On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 15:27 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > dan, > > > > I recall reading that the PDB Resolver is offline pending > > upg

Re: [BioRDF] All about the LSID URI/URN

2006-07-31 Thread Benjamin H Szekely
rnet Technology, Cambridge, MA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Eric Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/31/2006 01:30:03 PM: > Benjamin H Szekely wrote: > > The LSID Java Toolkit supports both SOAP and HTTP.   The HTTP version is > > very simple and does not use Axis.  I believe work is be

Re: LSID lookup details: help? [was: All about the LSID URI/URN]

2006-07-31 Thread Benjamin H Szekely
Perhaps try one of the following LSIDs urn:lsid:gdb.org:GenomicSegment:GDB132938 urn:lsid:ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.lsid.biopathways.org:pubmed:12441807 - Ben Ben Szekely IBM Software Engineer Advanced Internet Technology, Cambridge, MA [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/31/2006 01:34:31 P

Re: LSID lookup details: help? [was: All about the LSID URI/URN]

2006-07-31 Thread Benjamin H Szekely
Based on some quick research Steve Evanchik did at the lab here... "The domain rcsb.org periodically doesn't resolve correctly on my machine: $ nslookup.exe rcsb.org Server:  somdns01.srv.ibm.com Address:  9.0.5.1 Name:    rcsb.org and from my Linux machine: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> nslookup rc

Re: [BioRDF] All about the LSID URI/URN

2006-07-31 Thread Benjamin H Szekely
The LSID Java Toolkit supports both SOAP and HTTP.   The HTTP version is very simple and does not use Axis.  I believe work is being done outside of development team to implement a more lightweight, HTTP-only version of the LSID Java stack.   - Ben   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/31/2006 11:36:58

Re: LSIDs and ontology segmentation

2006-07-13 Thread Benjamin H Szekely
Hi All,     What Mark points out, quoted below, is absolutely correct.  In the NCBI prototype ontologies, every OWL Class and Property has its own LSID and resolves to the small amount of RDF that encapsulates it.  As an example, resolve the LSID for the OMIM ontology urn:lsid:ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.ls

Re: [rdf] Re: proposal for standard NCBI database URI

2006-05-10 Thread Benjamin H Szekely
illip Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/10/2006 06:25:07 AM: > >>>>> "BHS" == Benjamin H Szekely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >   BHS> Hi All, >   >   BHS> I did a time-consuming but naive first approach by >   BHS> translite

RE: [rdf] Re: proposal for standard NCBI database URI

2006-05-09 Thread Benjamin H Szekely
Hi All,   I'm new to this list and I only did a cursory reading of the archives so I apologize if I add anything that has already been addressed.  As some of you know, Stephen Evanchik and myself are the lead developers on the LSID Toolkit.  I have implemented a prototype LSID Resolution Service