Hi,
Issue 8 is an important one.
Recommended input to adress this issue: "The Ontology for General Medical
Science (OGMS) is an ontology of entities involved in a clinical encounter.
OGMS includes very general terms that are used across medical disciplines,
including: 'disease', 'disorder', 'disea
Thank you David for the notes and Frederik for a great presentation
Ingeborg briefly mentioned some challanges in using the current RDF version
of CDISC's so called Controlled Terminologies (CTs) from NCI EVS. I think
the way such Value Sets are modelled, identified and represented as "first
class
+10
On Tuesday, December 16, 2014, David Booth wrote:
> That reminds me: We should look at the possibility of developing a JSON-LD
> @context for FHIR JSON, to allow it to be directly interpreted as JSON-LD
> (and thus as RDF).
>
> For those unfamiliar with JSON-LD, it is JSON that has an additi
. Want you may need could be
> complementary to what we do/aim to do, but happy to discuss options for
> collaborations.
> Thanks,
> Susanna
>
>
>
> On 21/09/2014 12:49, Kerstin Forsberg wrote:
>
> Hi Andrea,
> in an earlier attempt to design and launch a
Hi Andrea,
in an earlier attempt to design and launch a Metadata Registry for clinical
trial data, called Clinical Reference Library1 ). To capture and manage
descriptions of versions of clinical trial data standards, and of variants
of actual clinical trial datasets, we applied the software patter
Hi Richard,
This great news. And even better if FDA leveraged the excellent work you
and others have done on linked data. I wrote a short blog post about this
recently http://kerfors.blogspot.se/2014/04/openfda.html
Kind Regards
Kerstin
AstraZeneca
On Wednesday, May 7, 2014, Richard Boyce wrote:
initiatives
on Data Elements as the next level of granularity, i.e. Data Elements as
the types of data in the datasets. I hope to talk much more about this with
the HCLS folks at SWAT4LS next week
Kind Regards
Kerstin Forsberg
AstraZenenca
2013/12/5 Carole Goble
>
> heard of this?
> htt
use.eu/ (Thanks for the note, will be updated)
For more information about the FDA projects on the PhUSE wiki see
http://www.phusewiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=Emerging_Technologies
Kind Regards
Kerstin Forsberg
AstraZeneca
2013/10/29 Joachim Baran
> Hello,
>
> I came across http
On 3 sep 2013, at 09:44, Joanne Luciano wrote:
> Kerstin,
>
> Would you say more about 1.
See below
> On Sep 3, 2013, at 2:50 AM, Kerstin Forsberg
> wrote:
>
> 1:
>> - How to align this with the interest in getting RDF (SKOS) versions
>> direct
Hi Eric,
Thanks for the link to the RIM RDF tutorial, will read with great interest.
I'll not able to join tomorrow. Two thoughts re. mappings.
- How to align this with the interest in getting RDF (SKOS) versions directly
from source (eg we have a good interaction with MedDRA MSSO about this).
ns applied as RDF
side by side. That is both the standard and instances of
clinical data. As a example to discuss pros/cons etc.
Kerstin
Sent from my iPhone
On 12 jul 2013, at 11:52, "Luciano, Joanne S." wrote:
>
> On Jul 10, 2013, at 11:37 PM, Kerstin Forsberg
> w
Hi Joanne,
I'm intrerested in learning more about SIO and it's potential for clinical
data.
I can think of two related, and quite, different approaches:
- CDISC provide some pieces of standards for questionnaires, such as
Hamilton scale (e.g.. the list of text strings to identify different
questi
Thanks Egon and Michel - I think the current drive for clinical trial data
transparency makes "getting better in talking to machines" even more
important, see http://kerfors.blogspot.se/2013/03/talking-to-machines.html
2013/4/8 Egon Willighagen
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Michel Dumontier
FDA, Office of Translation Sciences Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, has announced a fellowship working on 1): "improving the
efficiency of human drug review through required electronic submissions and
standardization of electronic drug application data utilizing Semantic Web
technologies."
Data Space for Clinical
> Trials<http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0567>.
> CoRR abs/0908.0567 2009
>
>
> Cheers,
> Oktie
>
>
> Oktie Hassanzadeh
> ok...@cs.toronto.edu
> http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~oktie
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 16, 20
Hi,
a couple of tweets, blog post comments 1) and email exchanges during the
week on moving ClinicalTrials.gov "from strings to things" made me think
this could be a topic for discussion at the upcoming CSHALS. As I'll not be
able to be there in person I'm using this email list to hear your thought
Hi,
I came to think of Richard Boyce's nice presentation recently on Linked SPL
1) when I studying ISO's / HL7's standards for Identification of Medicinal
Products (IMPD) 2).
For me the IDMP's data elements and controlled vocabularies looks like a
perfect case for semantic web standards and linked
Great discussion in the meeting today and on the email list: BRIDG/OWL,
FHIR/SW, Extensional and Intensional /" design-time" and "run-time" models,
... a lot of interesting things seems to converge for how to model patient
data.
At the same time I think it would be useful to explore a RDF impleme
representation will almost certainly
> benefit from this effort.
>
> charlie
> ________
> From: Kerstin Forsberg [kerstin.l.forsb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 1:57 AM
> To: HCLS hcls
> Subject: FDA: seeks input on Study Da
based proposal?
Kind Regards
Kerstin Forsberg
AstraZeneca
https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2012/08/14/2012-19748/regulatory-new-drug-review-solutions-for-study-data-exchange-standards-notice-of-meeting-request-for
//www.linked2safety-project.eu/ )
Regards
Kerstin Forsberg
@kerfors
2012/6/14 Me
> now with the "right" email for hcls chairs
>
> From: "M. Scott Marshall"
>
> Subject: COI demo down?
>
> Date: June 14, 2012 4:55:23 PM GMT+02:00
>
> To: team-hcls-cha...@w
with the author of this blog post on
another FDA source:
http://semantically-challenged.blogspot.se/2010/02/fda-electronic-orange-book-in-rdf.html
I try to push for this in the public via my interactions with CDISC 1),
in comments on blogs 2) etc. and internally by for example providing
information mana
Skickat från min iPhone
23 maj 2012 kl. 23:55 skrev "Matthias Samwald"
:
> Dear all,
>
> I think these details are relevant for reasoning about patient data et
> cetera., but the documentation of schema.org and the proposed medical
> extensions make it very clear that they are not intended
Hi Eric and Michel,
I sneaked into the meeting today as I am interested in FHIR and also think
a semweb / linkeddata appraoch on it would be great. I have come across it
in my work in the European IMI project EHR4CR. The typical approach you
Eric very well described for traditional EHR (HL7) data i
other Vitals Signs examples, it would be
interrsting to see see a real example of clinical data using the BFO based
Vital Signs Ontology
http://bio-ontologies.knowledgeblog.org/155
Kerstin Forsberg
AstraZeneca
Observations
Interoperability: EMR + Clinical Trials. Seems to be very much related to the
two first EHR4CR scenarios - 1 (Protocol Feasibility) and 2 (Patient
Recruitment)
Thanks
Kerstin Forsberg
@kerfors
Eric, Chime, Michel, Alan et al.'
This is a truly important discussion for all of us that work on
patient records / clinical data.
Conclusions and recommendations on the issue of units for numerical
data values given semantic web standards and linked data principles
from the combined intelligenci
The issue of units for measurements was also discussed (but not solved?)
in the IAO (Information Artifact Ontology) group earlier this year,
see for example:
http://groups.google.com/group/information-ontology/browse_thread/thread/59724cd906d31841
28 matches
Mail list logo
