Dear All,
For those of you who will or might attend ISWC in Karlsruhe, you may be
interested in the 1-day tutorial on reasoning for Ontology Engineering
and Usage, on 27 Oct 2008.
In brief:
Engineering and using large OWL ontologies is a complex task for which
impressive tool support has re
M. Scott Marshall ha scritto:
You will find the minutes for yesterday's call here:
http://www.w3.org/2008/06/26-hcls-minutes.html
Vipul's comment ("when suggesting a particular technology for a project,
one should explain the value of that particular tech to the user") is a
valid point... As
://www.inf.unibz.it/phpsurveyor/index.php?sid=10
[3]
http://keet.wordpress.com/2008/03/30/tools-to-access-data-through-an-ontology/
[4] http://www.inf.unibz.it/~rodriguez/OBDA/beta06/index.html
Best regards,
Marijke Keet
C. Maria Keet
KRDB Research Centre
Faculty of Computer Science
Free
Hi,
for those of you who have students who focus on computer science &
Semantic Web technologies, the EMCL Master's programme may be of
interest for getting a solid foundation of SW tech and broader
underlying theory. The scholarships are generous for non-EU people in
particular.
cheers,
m
Dear All,
Unfortunately, I couldn't attend (being at the topically related AAAI
Semantic e-Science workshop), but it's good to read the summary and that
interest in bio & SW seems to be expanding (be it linear or
exponentially) -- and well ahead compared to the enterprise domain.
As for t
Eric Neumann ha scritto:
Alan,
the life science community has for years applied an implicit
transitivity to records of things, so that when many say:
"http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/P12345 is expressed only in species
homo sapien"
they usually imply that "the protein referenced by
data
Eric Jain ha scritto:
Marijke Keet wrote:
just because proteins are smaller than persons does not make them
into mere abstractions--thingies of your imagination that only
materialise by means of their representations in some information
system. proteins were around for quite a while before
Eric Jain ha scritto:
Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
There are proteins, and there are records about proteins. Records
come in different formats. If I make a statement using this url, is
is about the record? or the protein? How should the agent come to know?
The concept of "protein" is abstract eno
The history of computing is the history of "design patterns" at one
level that eventually get built into "higher level languages" at the
next level of abstraction up.
I think I have a less optimistic view of progress in computer
science. For example, many of the paradigmatic GoF design
Dear All,
Regarding “reification design patterns” and the reification & OWL (not
the thorny logic-based representation of beliefs et al), permit me to
mention that support for n-ary relations ---where n may also be >2--- in
description logics is already possible with DLR [1] and implemented w
10 matches
Mail list logo
