Hi Marc, a quick look at the MedicationStrength structure shows that there's no
capacity to distinguish between the active ingredient and the corresponding
basis-of-strength substance.
It's also unclear to me how to represent multi-ingredient medications, but that
may just be my unfamiliarity w
Hi David,
FWIW, if we’re talking OWL reasoners and concrete domains, then Snorocket (used
for SNOMED by IHTSDO and the Australian Medicines Terminology) will treat 1.23
as equal to 1.230 as per the xsd semantics.
michael
--
Michael J Lawley, PhD
Senior Principal Research Scientist, Research Gr
Due to several requests, we decided to extend the submission deadline to July
21, 2014. This is a hard deadline and no further extension will be given. In
addition, authors will have a change to provide
Strictly speaking, this is not an “official” mapping, and it is subject to
change without warning. However, it is not unreasonable to use it as
indicative of the DL representation of SNOMED CT and it was the model used when
the IHTSDO moved their tooling from a bespoke algorithm to Snorocket,
NJIT have some really good tooling for visualising large ontologies like SNOMED
CT but also (I am told) recently applied to OWL.
See web.njit.edu/~cro3/
michael
--
Dr Michael Lawley
Principal Research Scientist
The Australia e-Health Research Centre http://aehrc.com/
work: +61 7 3253 3609; mo
One consequence is that you must omit anything in the situation hierarchy of
SNOMED CT, but that is almost certainly a "good thing"
Michael
Sent from my iPhone
On 18/10/2012, at 2:27 PM, "Renato Iannella"
mailto:renato.ianne...@nehta.gov.au>> wrote:
On 17 Oct 2012, at 08:11, peter.hend...@kp
