...@lmckenzie.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2014 6:15 PM
To: Vipul Kashyap
Cc: David Booth; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
Subject: Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI
call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)
Well, for FHIR at a minimum, you must be ab
approach is indeed better – but
I would love to see use cases and examples illustrating this…
Thanks,
---Vipul
From: Lloyd McKenzie [mailto:ll...@lmckenzie.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2014 6:00 PM
To: Vipul Kashyap
Cc: David Booth; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
Subject: Re: Minutes of
To: Vipul Kashyap
Cc: Grahame Grieve; David Booth; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
Subject: Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI
call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)
Hi Vipul,
First, we would never define a specialized resource. As much as pos
I think using a concrete example helps. One thing which is becoming clear it
that we are perhaps modeling Snomed in different ways.
ok, well, how it works is that FHIR has a resource called "condition", which is
a record keeping construct people use to exchange information about proble
Lloyd
--
Lloyd McKenzie
+1-780-993-9501
Note: Unless explicitly stated otherwise, the opinions and positions expressed
in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect those of my clients nor those of the
organizations with whom I hold governance pos
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any
attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you.
From:"Vipul Kashyap"
To:"'Grahame Grieve'" , "'
.
For now – just want to make sure we are on the same page – we can figure out
whether this approach has value, is feasible etc. later.
---Vipul
From: graha...@gmail.com [mailto:graha...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Grahame Grieve
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 2:16 PM
To: Vipul Kashyap
in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect those of my clients nor those of the
organizations with whom I hold governance positions.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Vipul Kashyap > wrote:
Good list, Lloyd. Would like to suggest some more additions (apologies if these
have already been
If every FHIR element was mapped to a snomed term, then you could represent
that in RDF no problems.
VK> Would propose that FHIR could be the hub – and we could leverage RDF/OWL
constructs to map FHIR elements to Snomed, MedDRA, ICD11, RxNorm, etc.?
However the problem with this is tha
expressed
in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect those of my clients nor those of the
organizations with whom I hold governance positions.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Vipul Kashyap wrote:
Good list, Lloyd. Would like to suggest some more additions (apologies if these
have already been sugg
Good list, Lloyd. Would like to suggest some more additions (apologies if these
have already been suggested).
· Clearly articulate the value of the new RDF/RDFS/OWL representation
over the current XML/JSON representation
· Enablement of OWL/RDFS inference – so we could identi
: Michael Miller [mailto:michael.mil...@systemsbiology.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 12:03 PM
To: Vipul Kashyap
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; peter.hend...@kp.org; da...@dbooth.org
Subject: RE: HCLS Agenda Thursday (tomorrow): Roadmap on RDF for Healthcare
Information Interoperability
Hi Peter,
Is it possible for us to get more information on this? A write up, a paper
or something?
An interesting point to note - is that Claims/Administrative Billing Data is
an important data source for HEDIS metrics and reports.
Is your system based on EMR data or claims data?
The r
Agree with David - that HCLS has done a good job in raising awareness in the
W3C community - with informal participation from HL7 regulars. However, I
think we need some sort of a deeper collaboration - to achieve impact.
Another body to involve is ONC - which is likely to be influential - Not
sur
One suggestion would be to organize this around some concrete use cases – as we
have done in the past around the COI Task Force.
Some examples which come to mind would be:
- Clinical Decision Support at the point of care
- Clinical Analytics and Risk Stratification
- Leveragi
Tonya, Alfredo and I did some work related to modeling clinical
documentation questionnaires - presented at ISWC 2005.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=7780078922780239485&hl=en&as_sdt=0
,7
The key issue here was to "separate" out the following:
1. Presentation UI elements
2. Th
16 matches
Mail list logo
