chris mungall wrote:
I think both approaches are a little too XML-centric; fine for a few
use cases but in general the syntax obscures the declarative semantics
of the mapping which must be kept as perspicuous as possible. Why not
just use an RDF query language? This could be used to query o
On Mar 1, 2006, at 7:33 AM, Duncan Hull wrote:
Matthias Samwald wrote:
XSLT definitly is not sufficient for such conversions, I agree.
XQuery, however, is much more powerful than XSLT and has most
features of a 'full blown programming language'.
If you're trying to decide between XSL
Matthias Samwald wrote:
XSLT definitly is not sufficient for such conversions, I agree. XQuery,
however, is much more powerful than XSLT and has most features of a 'full blown
programming language'.
If you're trying to decide between XSLT and XQuery to perform some task,
this paper by Mic
