> my comment was about the need for a "underlying model". While the issue I
> raised is about our current focus on the mappings between specific terms
> in different terminologies. Instead I would like us to move beyond the
> mappings and focus more on how to specify different types/classes/kinds
ISC's first package of controlled terminologies for lab tests
and vital signs published as a Excel matrix
http://www.cdisc.org/standards/terminology/SDTM_Package_1_Labtest_FINAL_Production_Spreadsheet_June2007.xls
-Original Message-
From: Alan Ruttenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 oktober
Hi Kersten,
During the COI call this week you made some reference to the
"underlying model" being an issue in filling out Vipul's functional
requirements spread sheet.
Do you think you could say again what the issue was that you were
referring to?
-Alan
