: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Michael D (Rosetta)
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 1:50 PM
To: kei cheung; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: w3c semweb hcls
Subject: RE: [HCLS] RE: scientific publishing task force update
Hi Kei,
It means that
c: w3c semweb hcls
> Subject: RE: [HCLS] RE: scientific publishing task force update
>
>
> Hi Kei,
>
> > It means that things might not overlap at
> > the same level, but may overlap at different levels between different
> > ontologies (entity modeled at a h
Good point, Michael.I think there maybe ways to use some combination of NamedGraphs, SKOS, and Topic Maps to address different aspects of this general issue. We're working on this in the BIRN project and expect it will help us - and others - make use of the OBO Foundry ontologies - and data/litera
cepts in the first ontology,
and so on.
cheers,
Michael
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kei cheung
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 7:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 'w3c semweb hcls'
> Subject: Re:
Hi Don et. al,
I'm also catching up with all the exciting communications that have been
going on within the HCLSIG forum. Different neuroscience databases store
different but related types of information at possibly different levels
of detail and granularity. It means that things might not o
Kei is correct that there is overlap in the approach I think we're taking to
and Eric's ideas. My mentor Karl Pribram wrote about neuroscience as a
modern day "Tower of Babel" in his 1972 "Languages of the Brain."
Not only is the situation is much the same today but I don't believe that
will ever
