- Original Message -
> From: "Lloyd McKenzie"
> To: "David Booth"
> Cc: "w3c semweb HCLS" , "HL7 ITS"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 11:58:24 AM
> Subject: Re: FHIR as JSON-LD? [was Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) H
+10
On Tuesday, December 16, 2014, David Booth wrote:
> That reminds me: We should look at the possibility of developing a JSON-LD
> @context for FHIR JSON, to allow it to be directly interpreted as JSON-LD
> (and thus as RDF).
>
> For those unfamiliar with JSON-LD, it is JSON that has an additi
If the *only* change to the JSON syntax was the addition of a single
@context at the root of each element (and/or bundle), that might be
sellable as part of the official JSON syntax. (Particularly if that could
be established as a simple fixed value and perhaps even stand in place of
our existing
That reminds me: We should look at the possibility of developing a
JSON-LD @context for FHIR JSON, to allow it to be directly interpreted
as JSON-LD (and thus as RDF).
For those unfamiliar with JSON-LD, it is JSON that has an additional
"@context" annotation that allows it to be interpreted as
