Not enough people could make it.
David
Forwarded Message
Subject: HL7/W3C Agenda Tue Jun 21: ShEx validation of FHIR RDF and FHIR
on schema.org
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:51:36 -0400
From: David Booth
To: i...@lists.hl7.org , w3c semweb HCLS
Agenda:
- ShEx validation
Colleagues,
Please join me at 8am Pacific on Wednesday February 17, 2016 to
discuss your implementation of the HCLS dataset descriptions.
Join the call: https://www.uberconference.com/micheldumontier
Optional dial in number: 716-293-8697
PIN: 88433
Thanks!
m.
Michel Dumontier, PhD
Associate
W3C HCLS COI Group - Weekly Teleconference
ORGANIZER;RSVP=TRUE;CN=David Booth;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;ROLE=CHAIR:mailto:dav
i...@dbooth.org
ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;CN=i...@lists.hl7.org;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=OPT-PAR
TICIPANT:mailto:i...@lists.hl7.org
ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;CN=w3c semweb HCLS;PARTSTAT=N
Dear colleagues,
Happy New Year!
I'm writing to you today to obtain feedback on the HCLS Interest Group
Note on Dataset Descriptions (http://www.w3.org/TR/hcls-dataset/),
published last year on May 14, 2015. In particular, we would like to
encourage members to implement the standard and r
W3C HCLS COI Group - Weekly Teleconference
ORGANIZER;RSVP=TRUE;CN=David Booth;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;ROLE=CHAIR:mailto:dav
i...@dbooth.org
ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;CN=i...@lists.hl7.org;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=OPT-PAR
TICIPANT:mailto:i...@lists.hl7.org
ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;CN=w3c semweb HCLS;PARTSTAT=N
W3C HCLS COI Group - Orlando Teleconference
RECURRENCE-ID;TZID=America/New_York:20160112T11
ORGANIZER;RSVP=TRUE;CN=David Booth;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;ROLE=CHAIR:mailto:dav
i...@dbooth.org
ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;CN=i...@lists.hl7.org;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=OPT-PAR
TICIPANT:mailto:i...@lists.hl7
W3C HCLS COI Group - Weekly Teleconference
RECURRENCE-ID;TZID=America/New_York:20151229T11
ORGANIZER;RSVP=TRUE;CN=David Booth;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;ROLE=CHAIR:mailto:dav
i...@dbooth.org
ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;CN=i...@lists.hl7.org;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=OPT-PAR
TICIPANT:mailto:i...@lists.hl7
W3C HCLS COI Group - Weekly Teleconference
RECURRENCE-ID;TZID=America/New_York:20151222T11
ORGANIZER;RSVP=TRUE;CN=David Booth;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;ROLE=CHAIR:mailto:dav
i...@dbooth.org
ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;CN=i...@lists.hl7.org;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=OPT-PAR
TICIPANT:mailto:i...@lists.hl7
W3C HCLS COI Group - Weekly Teleconference
RECURRENCE-ID;TZID=America/New_York:20151117T11
ORGANIZER;RSVP=TRUE;CN=David Booth;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;ROLE=CHAIR:mailto:dav
i...@dbooth.org
ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;CN=i...@lists.hl7.org;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=OPT-PAR
TICIPANT:mailto:i...@lists.hl7
W3C HCLS COI Group - Weekly Teleconference
RECURRENCE-ID;TZID=America/New_York:20151006T11
ORGANIZER;RSVP=TRUE;CN=David Booth;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;ROLE=CHAIR:mailto:dav
i...@dbooth.org
ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;CN=i...@lists.hl7.org;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=OPT-PAR
TICIPANT:mailto:i...@lists.hl7
Both EricP and I are on vacation this week, so there won't be a chair
tomorrow (Wed), but I believe at least Tony Mallia and Lloyd McKenzie
will be able to join the call, and work on fhir:CodeableThingy. I'll be
back on the calls next week.
Thanks,
David Booth
SUMMARY:HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup & W3C HCLS COI Group - Weekly Teleconference
ORGANIZER;RSVP=TRUE;CN=David Booth;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;ROLE=CHAIR:mailto:dav
i...@dbooth.org
ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRUE;CN=i...@lists.hl7.org;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;ROLE=OPT-PAR
TICIPANT:mailto:i...@lists.hl7.org
ATTENDEE;RSVP=TRU
/ Michel Dumontier\n\nWe will continue the 'dat
aset description' discussion today at 11AM ET / 4PM UK / 5PM CET. \n\nZakim
(W3C teleconference bridge).\nDial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge\, MA)\
nVoIP address: sip:za...@voip.w3.org\nParticipant Access Code: 4257 ("HCLS"
/ Michel Dumontier\n\nWe will continue the 'dat
aset description' discussion today at 11AM ET / 4PM UK / 5PM CET. \n\nZakim
(W3C teleconference bridge).\nDial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge\, MA)\
nVoIP address: sip:za...@voip.w3.org\nParticipant Access Code: 4257 ("HCLS"
/question in advance directly on that wiki page:
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Ontology_Requirements
Complete agenda page:
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_RDF_ConCall_Agenda
TO SPEED UP THE START OF OUR CALLS:
It would help if participants would do the following:
1. Join the IR
Complete agenda page:
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_RDF_ConCall_Agenda
TO SPEED UP THE START OF OUR CALLS:
It would help if participants would do the following:
1. Join the IRC channel #hcls that we're using, as described here, prior
to joining the teleconference line:
http://wik
/ Michel Dumontier\n\nWe will continue the 'dat
aset description' discussion today at 11AM ET / 4PM UK / 5PM CET. \n\nZakim
(W3C teleconference bridge).\nDial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge\, MA)\
nVoIP address: sip:za...@voip.w3.org\nParticipant Access Code: 4257 ("HCLS"
Thanks,
>
> -Guoqian
>
>
>
> From: Lloyd McKenzie
> Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 1:10 PM
> To: David Booth
> Cc: "Jiang, Guoqian, M.D., Ph.D." , "
> public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org" , "
> i...@lists.hl7.org" , Eric Prud'h
quot;i...@lists.hl7.org<mailto:i...@lists.hl7.org>"
mailto:i...@lists.hl7.org>>, Eric Prud'hommeaux
mailto:e...@w3.org>>, "Solbrig, Harold R."
mailto:solbrig.har...@mayo.edu>>
Subject: Re: San Antonio Summary & Agenda for Tue Jan 27 HL7 ITS / W3C HCLS
I don't really understand what this means. Value set binding is fully
defined in FHIR already (in the Profile, DataElement an Questionnaire
resources). How that gets represented when we convert Profile to OWL is
very much in-scope. Similarly, Profile, DataElement and Questionnaire are
all mechan
Hi Guoqian,
On 01/27/2015 12:35 PM, Jiang, Guoqian, M.D., Ph.D. wrote:
Hi, David,
In the conference call this morning, we agreed to make FHIR common model
for data element management and value set binding as a separate project
outside FHIR Ontology project. It is a good timing as we at Mayo are
complete notes are here:
>http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_RDF_Concall_Minutes_20150119
>
>Complete agenda page:
>http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_RDF_ConCall_Agenda
>
>TO SPEED UP THE START OF OUR CALLS:
>It would help if participants would do the following:
>
>1.
:
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_RDF_Concall_Minutes_20150119
Complete agenda page:
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_RDF_ConCall_Agenda
TO SPEED UP THE START OF OUR CALLS:
It would help if participants would do the following:
1. Join the IRC channel #hcls that we're usin
/ Michel Dumontier\n\nWe will continue the 'dat
aset description' discussion today at 11AM ET / 4PM UK / 5PM CET. \n\nZakim
(W3C teleconference bridge).\nDial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge\, MA)\
nVoIP address: sip:za...@voip.w3.org\nParticipant Access Code: 4257 ("HCLS"
Since we do not have formal arrangements for teleconference access
during our hackathon sessions in San Antonio, please email me directly
if you want us to try to include you via skype or google hangout or
such. I would be happy to do so.
Thanks!
David
On 01/17/2015 11:41 PM, David Booth wro
Agenda for San Antonio meetings:
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_RDF_ConCall_Agenda#Agenda_for_San_Antonio_Face-to-Face_Meetings
Anyone leading a FHIR RDF / ontology hacking session should please edit
that section of the agenda wiki page to list your session (if it isn't
already listed)
/ Michel Dumontier\n\nWe will continue the 'dat
aset description' discussion today at 11AM ET / 4PM UK / 5PM CET. \n\nZakim
(W3C teleconference bridge).\nDial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge\, MA)\
nVoIP address: sip:za...@voip.w3.org\nParticipant Access Code: 4257 ("HCLS"
a for San Antonio is
at the bottom of our main agenda page (link below).
Complete agenda page:
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_RDF_ConCall_Agenda
TO SPEED UP THE START OF OUR CALLS:
It would help if participants would do the following:
1. Join the IRC channel #hcls that we're
ttend, either in
person or by teleconference:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/S7B8HTY
Complete agenda page:
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_RDF_ConCall_Agenda
TO SPEED UP THE START OF OUR CALLS:
It would help if participants would do the following:
1. Join the IRC channel #hcls that
on that page.
Complete agenda page:
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_RDF_ConCall_Agenda
TO SPEED UP THE START OF OUR CALLS:
It would help if participants would do the following:
1. Join the IRC channel #hcls that we're using, as described here, prior
to joining the teleconference
Eric will share his screen using https://talky.io/hcls for today's
teleconference. Please disable your camera when you join!
Thanks,
David
On 12/19/2014 03:47 PM, David Booth wrote:
On Tuesday's call we will continue the FHIR ontology focus. We may have
a lighter attendance
- Original Message -
> From: "Lloyd McKenzie"
> To: "David Booth"
> Cc: "w3c semweb HCLS" , "HL7 ITS"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 11:58:24 AM
> Subject: Re: FHIR as JSON-LD? [was Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) H
y and would not be sent.
>>>
>>> So the identifiers in the instance data are unique within the ontology
>>> and it is therefore like the namespace of the source system. The total
>>> ontology of the source system is their EHR without considering records
>>&
thout considering records
>> imported from other sources.
>>
>>
>>
>> I have assumed that Profiles are created and shared between system owners
>> who want to interoperate. There must be some governance to them.
>>
>>
>>
>> Tony
>>
>&g
; *From:* Lloyd McKenzie [mailto:ll...@lmckenzie.com]
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 21, 2014 11:28 PM
>
> *To:* Anthony Mallia
> *Cc:* Vipul Kashyap; David Booth; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
> *Subject:* Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C
> HCLS COI call
Tony
-Original Message-
From: David Booth [mailto:da...@dbooth.org]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 9:41 AM
To: Anthony Mallia; Lloyd McKenzie
Cc: Vipul Kashyap; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
Subject: Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI
call -- Review of FHI
her sources.
I have assumed that Profiles are created and shared between system
owners who want to interoperate. There must be some governance to them.
Tony
*From:*Lloyd McKenzie [mailto:ll...@lmckenzie.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, December 21, 2014 11:28 PM
*To:* Anthony Mallia
*Cc:* Vipul Kashyap; David Bo
’t have it both ways.
>
>
>
> Tony
>
>
>
> *From:* Lloyd McKenzie [mailto:ll...@lmckenzie.com]
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 21, 2014 12:31 PM
> *To:* Anthony Mallia
> *Cc:* Vipul Kashyap; David Booth; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
>
> *Subject:* Re: Minutes of last we
see why we can’t have it both ways.
Tony
From: Lloyd McKenzie [mailto:ll...@lmckenzie.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 12:31 PM
To: Anthony Mallia
Cc: Vipul Kashyap; David Booth; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
Subject: Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI
>
> *From:* Lloyd McKenzie [mailto:ll...@lmckenzie.com]
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 21, 2014 12:00 PM
>
> *To:* Vipul Kashyap
> *Cc:* David Booth; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
> *Subject:* Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C
> HCLS COI call -- Revie
: Vipul Kashyap
Cc: David Booth; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
Subject: Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI
call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)
Hi Vipul,
Yes, we'll be creating two different forms. Instances will be expressed in RDF
-
er/CA/KAIPERM@KAIPERM
> Cc:, , <
> i...@lists.hl7.org>, , ,
> "'Vipul Kashyap'"
> Date:12/20/2014 02:06 PM
> Subject:RE: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup /
> W3C HCLS COI call -- Review of FHIR ontology app
2) as well?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> ---Vipul
>
>
>
> *From:* Lloyd McKenzie [mailto:ll...@lmckenzie.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 20, 2014 6:15 PM
>
> *To:* Vipul Kashyap
> *Cc:* David Booth; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
> *Subject:* Re: Minutes of last we
Hi Matthias,
You're touching on an important point that I think we have not yet
articulated well enough.
No *single* ontology will meet all of the diverse use cases that occur
in healthcare and biomedical applications. That's obvious at one level,
but less obvious -- though still true -- ev
To: kashyap.vi...@gmail.com
Cc: da...@dbooth.org; grah...@healthintersections.com.au; i...@lists.hl7.org;
ll...@lmckenzie.com; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: RE: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI
call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)
I can think
s (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI
call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)
To: "kashyap.vi...@gmail.com"
Cc: "da...@dbooth.org" , "grah...@healthintersections.com.au"
, "i...@lists.hl7.org"
, "ll...@lmckenzie.com" ,
&qu
Dear all,
I have hardly participated in any of the calls lately and am coming at
this as a bit of an outsider. From my reading it indeed seems that any
officially accepted RDF version of FHIR data would use a code + code
system representation of 'concepts' from controlled vocabularies /
ontol
e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or
saving them. Thank you.
From: "Vipul Kashyap"
To: Peter Hendler/CA/KAIPERM@KAIPERM
Cc: , ,
, ,
, "'Vipul Kashyap'"
Date: 12/20/2014 02:06 PM
Subject: RE: Minutes of last week'
Hi Vipul,
On 12/20/2014 06:35 PM, Vipul Kashyap wrote:
Thanks for the feedback and clarification – Looks like we will have to
work at two different layers:
1.The syntactic translation from FHIR XML/JSON to RDF/OWL –
2.Enrichment of the RDF/OWL representation via ontologies and OWL
axioms.. wh
...@lmckenzie.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2014 6:15 PM
To: Vipul Kashyap
Cc: David Booth; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
Subject: Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI
call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)
Well, for FHIR at a minimum, you must be ab
ndeed better
> – but I would love to see use cases and examples illustrating this…
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> ---Vipul
>
>
>
> *From:* Lloyd McKenzie [mailto:ll...@lmckenzie.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 20, 2014 6:00 PM
> *To:* Vipul Kashyap
> *Cc:
approach is indeed better – but
I would love to see use cases and examples illustrating this…
Thanks,
---Vipul
From: Lloyd McKenzie [mailto:ll...@lmckenzie.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2014 6:00 PM
To: Vipul Kashyap
Cc: David Booth; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
Subject: Re: Minutes of
To: Vipul Kashyap
Cc: Grahame Grieve; David Booth; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
Subject: Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI
call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)
Hi Vipul,
First, we would never define a specialized resource. As much as pos
I think using a concrete example helps. One thing which is becoming clear it
that we are perhaps modeling Snomed in different ways.
ok, well, how it works is that FHIR has a resource called "condition", which is
a record keeping construct people use to exchange information about proble
en suggested).
>
>
>
> · Clearly articulate the value of the new RDF/RDFS/OWL
> representation over the current XML/JSON representation
>
> · Enablement of OWL/RDFS inference – so we could identify use
> cases that cannot be easily done based on the XML/JSON repr
From: Lloyd McKenzie [mailto:ll...@lmckenzie.com]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 1:36 PM
To: David Booth
Cc: w3c semweb HCLS; i...@lists.hl7.org
Subject: Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI
call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)
I think we n
; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: RE: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI
call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)
SNOMED can not and should not map to FHIR resources. This is the difference
between clinical models that capture who, when wher
da
TO SPEED UP THE START OF OUR CALLS:
It would help if participants would do the following:
1. Join the IRC channel #hcls that we're using, as described here, prior
to joining the teleconference line:
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_RDF_ConCall_Agenda#Teleconference_Detai
/ Michel Dumontier\n\nWe will continue the 'dat
aset description' discussion today at 11AM ET / 4PM UK / 5PM CET. \n\nZakim
(W3C teleconference bridge).\nDial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge\, MA)\
nVoIP address: sip:za...@voip.w3.org\nParticipant Access Code: 4257 ("HCLS"
/ Michel Dumontier\n\nWe will continue the 'dat
aset description' discussion today at 11AM ET / 4PM UK / 5PM CET. \n\nZakim
(W3C teleconference bridge).\nDial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge\, MA)\
nVoIP address: sip:za...@voip.w3.org\nParticipant Access Code: 4257 ("HCLS"
t translation machinery and had some stylistic differences.
>
> We also started discussing FHIR ontology requirements:
> http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Ontology_Requirements
>
> D
, but it used different translation machinery and had
some stylistic differences.
We also started discussing FHIR ontology requirements:
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Ontology_Requirements
Draft meeting minutes:
http://www.w3.org/2014/12/16-hcls-minutes.html
David Booth
down
>> that path I suspect you'd find at some point that you were ending up
>> re-inventing RDF.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David Booth
>>
>>
>> Bob Leif
>>
>> 1)R. C. Leif and Stephanie H. Leif, “A shared standard for
&
t; You might be able to extend XML that way, and it would be
>> interesting to see what you could come up with, but if you went down
>> that path I suspect you'd find at some point that you were ending up
>> re-inventing RDF.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
*From:*owner-...@lists.hl7.org <mailto:owner-...@lists.hl7.org>
[mailto:owner-its@lists.hl7.__org
<mailto:owner-...@lists.hl7.org>] *On
Behalf Of *Lloyd McKenzie
*Sent:* Saturday, December 13, 2014 3:39 PM
*To:* Vipul Kashyap
*Cc:* Davi
Health Care and Life Sciences
Interest Group Issue Tracker:
hcls-ACTION-12: Figure out whether he can share uri conventions for icd-11
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/25-hcls-minutes.html#action07] --
pending
http://www.w3.org/2014/HCLS/track/actions/12
Assigned to: Guoqian Jiang
--
nd Life Sciences
> Interest Group Issue Tracker:
>
>> hcls-ACTION-12: Figure out whether he can share uri conventions for icd-11
>> [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/25-hcls-minutes.html#action07] --
>> pending
>>
>> ht
,
choose to unsubscribe -- which might not be intended by the
administrators!).
Thanks,
Matthias
Am 16.12.2014 17:08, schrieb Semantic Web Health Care and Life Sciences
Interest Group Issue Tracker:
hcls-ACTION-12: Figure out whether he can share uri conventions for icd-11
[recorded in http
hcls-ACTION-13: And joshua to report on c-cda rdf representations work plan
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action07]
http://www.w3.org/2014/HCLS/track/actions/13
Assigned to: Eric Prud'hommeaux
hcls-ACTION-12: Figure out whether he can share uri conventions for icd-11
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/25-hcls-minutes.html#action07] --
pending
http://www.w3.org/2014/HCLS/track/actions/12
Assigned to: Guoqian Jiang
that path I suspect
> you'd find at some point that you were ending up re-inventing RDF.
>
> Thanks,
> David Booth
>
>
>> Bob Leif
>>
>> 1)R. C. Leif and Stephanie H. Leif, “A shared standard for cytometry and
>> pathology,” Paper No.: 8587-50, Tracking
.
Tony Mallia
From: Timothy W. Cook [mailto:t...@mlhim.org]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 1:44 AM
To: David Booth
Cc: rl...@rleif.com; Lloyd McKenzie; Vipul Kashyap; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
Subject: Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI
call -- Review of
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 10:34 PM, David Booth wrote:
>
> You might be able to extend XML that way, and it would be interesting to
> see what you could come up with, but if you went down that path I suspect
> you'd find at some point that you were ending up re-inventing RDF.
>
> Thanks,
> David Boo
lation, and Analysis of
Biomolecules, Cells, and Tissues XI 2013 (2013).
*From:*owner-...@lists.hl7.org [mailto:owner-...@lists.hl7.org] *On
Behalf Of *Lloyd McKenzie
*Sent:* Saturday, December 13, 2014 3:39 PM
*To:* Vipul Kashyap
*Cc:* David Booth; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
*Subject:* Re: M
: Imaging, Manipulation, and Analysis of Biomolecules,
Cells, and Tissues XI 2013 (2013).
From: owner-...@lists.hl7.org [mailto:owner-...@lists.hl7.org] On Behalf Of
Lloyd McKenzie
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 3:39 PM
To: Vipul Kashyap
Cc: David Booth; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
Subject: Re: Minutes
Marc Twagirumukiza | Agfa HealthCare
Senior Clinical Researcher | HE/Advanced Clinical Applications Research
T +32 3444 8188 | M +32 499 713 300
http://www.agfahealthcare.com
http://blog.agfahealthcare.com
Click on link to read important disclaimer:
http://www.agfahealthcare.com/maildisclaimer
From
il.com] *On Behalf Of *Grahame
> Grieve
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 13, 2014 2:16 PM
> *To:* Vipul Kashyap
> *Cc:* Lloyd McKenzie; David Booth; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
> *Subject:* Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C
> HCLS COI call -- Review of
OWL/RDFS inference – so we could identify use
> cases that cannot be easily done based on the XML/JSON representation
>
> · A common OWL/RDFS representation for information model elements
> *and* medical terminology concepts.
>
>
>
> Thoughts. Suggestions?
hem. Thank you.
From: "Vipul Kashyap"
To: "'Grahame Grieve'" , "'Lloyd
McKenzie'"
Cc: "'David Booth'" , "'w3c semweb HCLS'"
, "'HL7 ITS'"
Date: 12/13/2014 10:41 AM
Subj
ART OF OUR CALLS:
It would help if participants would do the following:
1. Join the IRC channel #hcls that we're using, as described here, prior
to joining the teleconference line:
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_RDF_ConCall_Agenda#Teleconference_Details
2. When you join the tele
Cc: Lloyd McKenzie; David Booth; w3c semweb HCLS; HL7 ITS
Subject: Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI
call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)
VK> Would propose that FHIR could be the hub – and we could leverage RDF/OWL
constructs to
...@healthintersections.com.au
Cc: ll...@lmckenzie.com; kashyap.vi...@gmail.com; da...@dbooth.org;
public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; i...@lists.hl7.org
Subject: Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI
call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)
One of my favorite tweet
If every FHIR element was mapped to a snomed term, then you could represent
that in RDF no problems.
VK> Would propose that FHIR could be the hub – and we could leverage RDF/OWL
constructs to map FHIR elements to Snomed, MedDRA, ICD11, RxNorm, etc.?
However the problem with this is tha
WL/RDFS representation for information model elements and
medical terminology concepts.
Thoughts. Suggestions?
---Vipul
From: Lloyd McKenzie [mailto:ll...@lmckenzie.com]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 1:36 PM
To: David Booth
Cc: w3c semweb HCLS; i...@lists.hl7.org
Subject: Re: Minutes
ments _and_
medical terminology concepts.
Thoughts. Suggestions?
---Vipul
*From:*Lloyd McKenzie [mailto:ll...@lmckenzie.com]
*Sent:* Monday, December 08, 2014 1:36 PM
*To:* David Booth
*Cc:* w3c semweb HCLS; i...@lists.hl7.org
*Subject:* Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subg
ion for information model
elements _and_ medical terminology concepts.
__ __
Thoughts. Suggestions?
__ __
---Vipul
__ __
*From:*Lloyd McKenzie [mailto:ll...@lmckenzie.com
]
*Sent:* Monday, December 08, 2014 1:36 PM
t of OWL/RDFS inference – so we could identify use
>>> cases that cannot be easily done based on the XML/JSON representation
>>>
>>> · A common OWL/RDFS representation for information model
>>> elements *and* medical terminology concepts.
>>>
&g
easily done based on the XML/JSON representation
>
> · A common OWL/RDFS representation for information model elements
> *and* medical terminology concepts.
>
>
>
> Thoughts. Suggestions?
>
>
>
> ---Vipul
>
>
>
> *From:* Lloyd McKenzie [mailto:l
l details, to enable
other work to be discussed on the main teleconference. The break-out
group will summarize its progress with the main group.
The log of yesterday's teleconference is available at
http://www.w3.org/2014/12/09-hcls-minutes.html
Thanks!
David Booth
, December 08, 2014 1:36 PM
To: David Booth
Cc: w3c semweb HCLS; i...@lists.hl7.org
Subject: Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI
call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)
I think we need to define our objectives for the RDF representation. Mine ar
1 801 265 4636
snachimu...@mmm.com | www.3mtcs.com
From: Lloyd McKenzie
To: David Booth
Cc: Grahame Grieve , w3c semweb
HCLS , "i...@lists.hl7.org"
Date: 12/08/2014 04:13 PM
Subject:Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup /
W3C HCLS COI cal
://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/74250499/icbo2014/icbo_2014_icd11_cts2_
camera-ready.pdf
Feel free to let me know if you have any questions,
Thanks,
-Guoqian
On 12/9/14 5:10 PM, "Semantic Web Health Care and Life Sciences Interest
Group Issue Tracker" wrote:
>hcls-ACTION-8: Figure out whether
Nachimuthu, MD, PhD* | Medical Informaticist
> 3M Health Information Systems, Inc.
> 575 W Murray Blvd, Murray, UT 84123, USA
> Office: +1 801 265 4636
> *snachimu...@mmm.com* | *www.3mtcs.com*
> <http://www.3mtcs.com/>
>
>
>
>
> From:Lloyd McKenzie
>
hcls-ACTION-11: Get the document on the web
http://www.w3.org/2014/HCLS/track/actions/11
Assigned to: Rob Frost
hcls-ACTION-10: And joshua to report on c-cda rdf representations work plan
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action07]
http://www.w3.org/2014/HCLS/track/actions/10
Assigned to: Eric Prud'hommeaux
hcls-ACTION-9: Establish/make a wiki page for c-cda rdf representations work
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action06] -- pend
http://www.w3.org/2014/HCLS/track/actions/9
Assigned to: Eric Prud'hommeaux
hcls-ACTION-7: Set up tracker meeting name [recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2014/11/25-hcls-minutes.html#action01] -- done
http://www.w3.org/2014/HCLS/track/actions/7
Assigned to: Eric Prud'hommeaux
hcls-ACTION-8: Figure out whether he can share uri conventions for icd-11
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/25-hcls-minutes.html#action07] --
pending
http://www.w3.org/2014/HCLS/track/actions/8
Assigned to: Guoqian Jiang
Yes. On the profile side, I'm certainly expecting that we'll be looking at
adding extensions to profile that allow manifesting relationships between
and abstractions of resources and properties, for a start.
--
Lloyd McKenzie
+1-780-993-9501
Note: Unless ex
I think that any ontology we create will have to be produceable in an
automated fashion from the FHIR artifacts. Any introduction of
hand-editing would be unacceptable from a maintainability and consistency
perspective. So we're looking at mechanical, no matter what. The question
is what the mec
1 - 100 of 1171 matches
Mail list logo
