Andrea Splendiani wrote:
Hi,
I'm not following you 100%. I'm talking about the identity of the URI
as a symbol. And I was thinking about a declarative approach, rather
than procedural one (or did I misunderstood ?). Up in this thread,
I've got an interesting answer by David Booth.
I
Hi,
I'm not following you 100%. I'm talking about the identity of the URI
as a symbol. And I was thinking about a declarative approach, rather
than procedural one (or did I misunderstood ?). Up in this thread,
I've got an interesting answer by David Booth.
ciao,
Andrea
Il giorno 02/mar/0
Andrea Splendiani wrote:
One thing that I think would be very useful, though it poses some
semantic problem... is the possibility to assert equivalence in rdf.
At the moment equivalence can be asserted only in owl (and this
implies a distinction between individuals, properties, classes...).
> From: Andrea Splendiani
>
> One thing that I think would be very useful, though it poses some
> semantic problem... is the possibility to assert equivalence in rdf.
> At the moment equivalence can be asserted only in owl (and this
> implies a distinction between individuals, properties, clas
One thing that I think would be very useful, though it poses some
semantic problem... is the possibility to assert equivalence in rdf.
At the moment equivalence can be asserted only in owl (and this
implies a distinction between individuals, properties, classes...).
But that is a lower level
