RE: Implications and Issues in Converting UML to RDF/OWL When Constructing HL7 RIM Ontology

2006-09-05 Thread Kashyap, Vipul
Hi Dan,   I think this is a good start. As others have suggested, we need to drill down further to understand our requirements and evaluate the need for representing RIM in OWL.. Some suggestions of deepening the use case are as follows: "An RDF system has been put in place to navigat

Re: Implications and Issues in Converting UML to RDF/OWL When Constructing HL7 RIM Ontology

2006-08-31 Thread Drew McDermott
> [Alan Rector] > Just as an added note Yes, I realized after posting that there was a flaw in my version. Thanks for correcting it. OWL is a godawful notation, in my humble opinion. It's been inflicted on logic-naive users who don't realize there are lots of alternatives.

Re: Implications and Issues in Converting UML to RDF/OWL When Constructing HL7 RIM Ontology

2006-08-31 Thread Alan Rector
Just as an added note If you express the example in the Manchester simplifeid syntax it becomes more obvious. See just below previous example On 28 Aug 2006, at 19:28, Drew McDermott wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] 2. Mapping UML attributes RDF properties In OO, all attributes of a clas

Re: Implications and Issues in Converting UML to RDF/OWL When Constructing HL7 RIM Ontology

2006-08-28 Thread Drew McDermott
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [...] > 2. Mapping UML attributes RDF properties > In OO, all attributes of a class will be inherited by its subclasses. In > RDF/OWL, there is not such "inheritance", such that > > {?A ?P ?X. ?B rdfs:subClassOf ?A} => {?B ?P ?X} > > (the above rule does not exist i

Re: Implications and Issues in Converting UML to RDF/OWL When Constructing HL7 RIM Ontology

2006-08-28 Thread Chimezie Ogbuji
itrary modeling decisions which may detract from the usefulness of the translation. Cheers, ---Vipul From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:public-semweb- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 5:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: public-semweb-life

RE: Implications and Issues in Converting UML to RDF/OWL When Constructing HL7 RIM Ontology

2006-08-27 Thread DAN . RUSSLER
rom the usefulness of the translation.   Cheers,   ---Vipul   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 5:13 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.orgSubject: Implications and Issues in Converting UML to RDF/OWL

RE: Implications and Issues in Converting UML to RDF/OWL When Constructing HL7 RIM Ontology

2006-08-27 Thread Kashyap, Vipul
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 5:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org Subject: Implications and Issues in Converting UML to RDF/OWL When Constructing HL7 RIM Ontology   Hi, Dan Given the detailed description of HL7 RIM and

Re: Implications and Issues in Converting UML to RDF/OWL When Constructing HL7 RIM Ontology

2006-08-25 Thread DAN . RUSSLER
Thanks Helen, I have some questions on your notes below that I'm afraid will display my ignorance and naivete in RDF. In addition, I don't have access to Protege and some of my questions may be well-answered there. As you discussed classCodes and inheritance below, I didn't catch how moodCode was i

Implications and Issues in Converting UML to RDF/OWL When Constructing HL7 RIM Ontology

2006-08-25 Thread helen . chen
Hi, Dan Given the detailed description of HL7 RIM and Domain Vocabulary, it is quite tempting to generate the RIM ontology directly from some kind of conversion scheme between UML and RDF/OWL , preferably some automated tools/scripts.   I assume you must aware some similar efforts in generating