RE: In defense of meaninglessness: an ontologist's dilemma*

2011-06-23 Thread David Booth
ci-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci- > > requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sivaram Arabandi, MD > > Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 7:23 AM > > To: HCLS > > Subject: In defense of meaninglessness: an ontologist's dilemma* > > > > The issue of meaningless

Re: In defense of meaninglessness: an ontologist's dilemma*

2011-06-23 Thread Joanne Luciano
malization, publishing, internationalization, > versioning, change management, mapping, reuse, query and discovery. > > Best, > > m. > > > -Original Message- > > From: public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci- > > requ...@w3.org] On Behal

Re: In defense of meaninglessness: an ontologist's dilemma*

2011-06-23 Thread Bob Futrelle
> requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sivaram Arabandi, MD > > Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 7:23 AM > > To: HCLS > > Subject: In defense of meaninglessness: an ontologist's dilemma* > > > > The issue of meaningless identifiers has been far more controversial than > > i

RE: In defense of meaninglessness: an ontologist's dilemma*

2011-06-23 Thread Michel_Dumontier
: HCLS > Subject: In defense of meaninglessness: an ontologist's dilemma* > > The issue of meaningless identifiers has been far more controversial than > imagined. After 70+ emails in the 2 threads > (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb- > lifesci/2011Jun/0080.htm

In defense of meaninglessness: an ontologist's dilemma*

2011-06-23 Thread Sivaram Arabandi, MD
The issue of meaningless identifiers has been far more controversial than imagined. After 70+ emails in the 2 threads (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2011Jun/0080.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2011Jun/0125.html), there is still