The flybase dataset doesn't contain any of the sequence data, and we
haven't tried querying residue sequences from within SPARQL
yet. However, this is something we will need to do for a related
project very shortly, so any experience or ideas you have would be
very interesting to us. Querying r
Hi Andrea,
We have some data on query performance for Jena TDB and Virtuoso over
a ~9 million triple dataset derived from FlyBase, the Drosophila model
organism database, see:
http://code.google.com/p/openflydata/wiki/BenchmarkResultsQueryFlyBaseGeneNames20081027
Some caveats about interpreting
: Re: Is there a benchmark of triple-stores with a "bias" to Life
Sciences ?
However, I'm not aware of a review/benchmark of these systems, both
regarding performances and features.
I've seen a few links like:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/LargeTripleStores
or
http://www4
However, I'm not aware of a review/benchmark of these systems, both
regarding performances and features.
I've seen a few links like:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/LargeTripleStores
or
http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/BerlinSPARQLBenchmark/results/index.html
But I would like to know how thes
>
> However, I'm not aware of a review/benchmark of these systems, both
>> regarding performances and features.
>> I've seen a few links like:
>>
>> http://esw.w3.org/topic/LargeTripleStores
>>
>> or
>>
>>
>> http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/BerlinSPARQLBenchmark/results/index.html
>>
>> But I
Andrea Splendiani wrote:
Hi,
In the context of a data-integration project, I'm doing some
preliminary analysis to see whether it makes sense to use a
triple-store to setup a backend/repository.
I have some experience with Jena, and In know projects making use of
Virtuoso or Sesame.
However,
Hi,
In the context of a data-integration project, I'm doing some
preliminary analysis to see whether it makes sense to use a triple-
store to setup a backend/repository.
I have some experience with Jena, and In know projects making use of
Virtuoso or Sesame.
However, I'm not aware of a revi