LODDers,
At today's LODD teleconference we discussed edits to the draft practice
note
(https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XzdsjCfPylcyOoNtDfAgz15HwRdCD-0e0ixh21_U0y0/edit?hl=en_US&pli=1).
The document is now structured more like a W3C practice note and
incorporates several good additions by Mikel Aranguren. The current
version also drops the case studies but this is only for the sake of
discussion (i.e., they can be added back in easily). Please comment on
this change. The reasons that I think that it might make sense to drop
the case studies from the notes are as follows:
1) we can post these on the LODD wiki and reference them from the note.
This will ensure that they can be updated and expanded
2) it will shorten the note and make it more focused
3) hopefully, the studies will be published shortly
Your comments are welcome and appreciated. We plan to have another
conference call next Thursday (11/10) where we can make the final
decisions. If you would like to edit the document (rather than place
comments) please do so locally highlighting your changes and I will
merge before next Thursday. This is so I can manage the very large
reference list efficiently.
kind regards,
-Rich
--
Richard Boyce, PhD
Assistant Professor of Biomedical Informatics
Scholar, Comparative Effectiveness Research Program
University of Pittsburgh
rd...@pitt.edu
412-648-6768
