Re: New side by side FHIR RDF comparison

2015-05-19 Thread Marc Twagirumukiza
Date: 19/05/2015 15:31 Subject: Re: New side by side FHIR RDF comparison Hi Marc, On 05/19/2015 05:00 AM, Marc Twagirumukiza wrote: > Hi Tony, > > Thanks sharing this new version. I was wondering if we should always add > datatypes. > f.eg

Re: New side by side FHIR RDF comparison

2015-05-19 Thread David Booth
/blog.agfahealthcare.com <http://blog.agfahealthcare.com/> Click on link to read important disclaimer: http://www.agfahealthcare.com/maildisclaimer From: Anthony Mallia To: "i...@lists.hl7.org" , w3c semweb HC

Re: New side by side FHIR RDF comparison

2015-05-19 Thread Marc Twagirumukiza
CLS Date: 19/05/2015 02:45 Subject: New side by side FHIR RDF comparison I have posted the new version http://wiki.hl7.org/images/2/25/FHIR_RDF_Sample_side_by_side_comparisons.pdf To see all the current stored versions you can go to http:

New side by side FHIR RDF comparison

2015-05-18 Thread Anthony Mallia
I have posted the new version http://wiki.hl7.org/images/2/25/FHIR_RDF_Sample_side_by_side_comparisons.pdf To see all the current stored versions you can go to http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=File:FHIR_RDF_Sample_side_by_side_comparisons.pdf This next version shows terminology binding in a