Hi Team,
Sorry for the delay....the minutes and link to meeting recording for the
June 20th meeting of the *standard sub-team* of the PDDI Info Model Task
Force are pasted below. Thanks to Elizabeth Garcia for writing them!
Kind regards, -R
Minutes for 6/20/2016 (Standard subgroup)
In Attendance: Mathias Brochhausen, Kim Nolen, Oya Beyan, Clément
Goehrs, Michel Dumontier, Richard Boyce, Louisa Zhang, Elizabeth Garcia
Meeting recording: http://goo.gl/X4SVzG
Meeting:
*
Update on the PDDIs to focus on
o
Content team progress on drug-drug interactions
o
Spreadsheet: Suggested potential drug-drug interactions
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DIeIuo7tZ6nVvd6MdO2xzzLtOSPXjAHI-DdBe9M3kiw/edit#gid=716618333>
+
Includes drug pairs that are somewhat representative of the
minimum information items
+
Highlighting: Decision Tree has been developed that will
guide the evidence and grading the interaction
#
Not computable, but it’s important because the minimum
info model will be based off of this
#
Where it fits in with the task force’s goals:
information items based off of expert consensus from
prior work
#
Demonstrating usefulness: need specific interactions to
focus on & important factors about those interactions
*
Progress on clinical consequence and evidence definitions(Elizabeth)
o
User-Centered Definitions
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MGPXSkRZVXCd8nzhEgHJLLSxYLhcixiNPqnAmty---M/edit?usp=sharing>(allows
for further comments)
o
We will be using these definitions to develop a new ontology for
the minimum information model
o
All comments collected through Qualtrics surveys and prior work
will be incorporated into appendices that will be part of the
W3C document
o
Clinical Consequences: no disagreement
o
Evidence
+
Discussion about scope (i.e., human vs. animal), does not
address information important for CDS
#
Definition is broad enough to include elements like
study design or annotation of evidence
+
Mathias will send out evidence work done so far (not to be
shared outside of the task force)
*
Progress on user scenarios and use cases(Elizabeth)
o
Louisa and Elizabeth have created a list of information needs
based on the user stories and stakeholder descriptions developed
by the task force
+
Draft document: PDDI User Information Needs
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EhHudBgH4TqNdqULZKJYp2tgyO2QtHANdbFSXH5rlUg/edit?usp=sharing>
+
Next steps are to synthesize the information needs into user
stories
o
Medication Reconciliation Use Cases: essential queries we’d
want to the information model to support
+
Hospital pharmacist and consultant pharmacist
+
Draft medication reconciliation use cases will be added to
PDDI site by July 1
o
Targeted and open-ended questions will be sent out to solicit
feedback
*
Progress on setting the scope(Mathias)
o
Knowledge Representation Core Considerations
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/14saXL4qhusPHxxN1Aymc5z_u7vH3j3V-YF9TKNjRxLQ/edit#heading=h.rrsinxzgxju8>
+
To what extent the knowledge representation should address
issues relating to data integrity
+
New effort outside the core considerations to address these
concerns
+
Useful discussion to have from the perspective of mode of
representation
#
Not what we represent, but how we represent information
o
Next meeting: July 7th, 9:00 AM – 10:00 AM CST
+
Goal: to wrap up the core consideration document and get it
to a point to share with the Content group
+
Standard sub-team members are welcome to attend
o
Goal is to get this into W3C document
o
Awaiting the first draft of the use cases
*
Future user-centered definitions
o
Frequency of adverse events (exposure vs. harm)
+
Complex; may take a few months to develop
o
Mechanism of Interaction
+
DINTO and DIDEO have done a lot of work addressing
*
Follow up for July
o
July 7thmeeting re: Knowledge Representation Core Considerations
o
User Stories and Medication Reconciliation Use Cases in progress
+
Medication Reconciliation Use Cases will be discussed at
all-team meeting
o
Decision Trees (Content group will be developing)
o
Close to submitting manuscript – systematic search for
literature discussing information needs
o Writing: by the end of July, we should have the beginnings of a
W3C note taking shape
