Hi Bob
I am a message behind in my thinking, thanks for all your input.
My use case is a lot less clear than it could be … in that the contribution I
am seeking to make lies somewhere in the tool-chain, not at the very bottom,
but also not right next to the scientists or clinicians working wit
Jeremy J Carroll [mailto:j...@syapse.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 3:30 PM
To: Freimuth, Robert R., Ph.D.
Cc: w3c semweb HCLS
Subject: Re: 'Variants' and Chromosome Modelling
Hi Bob
In this message I reply to
It will certainly be important to track metadata about the sequ
Hi Bob
In this message I reply to
> It will certainly be important to track metadata about the sequence analysis
> method, etc.
but not to
> In my opinion, the real potential of using semweb technologies with genetic
> data is in the layers of interpretation that are built from the genetic
> H, there are a lot of modeling questions in there.
The adage "all models are wrong, but some are useful" comes to mind. To answer
these questions, you need to define your use cases. What are you trying to
model? Why? How is the data going to be used?
Are you trying to model the sequen
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Jeremy J Carroll wrote:
>
> Jerven suggests:
>
> "instead of saying chrM it would have been solved by
> using
> http://my.lab.org/confidential/patientXXYYZZ/genome/sampleXX/ChrM/assemblyTTv43/VariantCalls5
> "
>
> rather than continuing the philosophical/theologic
On 2013-03-21, at 6:00 PM, Jeremy J Carroll wrote:
> "instead of saying chrM it would have been solved by
> using
> http://my.lab.org/confidential/patientXXYYZZ/genome/sampleXX/ChrM/assemblyTTv43/VariantCalls5";
> In this way of thinking, I am not really interested in an assembly of ChrM
> for
