cCusker [mailto:james.mccus...@yale.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 9:35 AM
> To: Helena Deus
> Cc: Michael Miller; W3C HCLSIG hcls
> Subject: Re: "molar" for concentration
>
> Ah, I thought you were looking for predicates for datatype properties.
> This makes m
gt;> Thanks all,
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Lena
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Michael Miller
>> wrote:
>>
>> hi all,
>>
>> i did take a quick look at MUO and it does seem sane.
>>
>> "For instanc
r solution = ??
>
>
>
> cheers,
>
> michael
>
>
>
> *From:* Helena Deus [mailto:helenad...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 16, 2011 3:17 PM
> *To:* Michael Miller
> *Cc:* Jim McCusker; Matthias Samwald; W3C HCLSIG hcls
>
> *Subject:* Re: "molar
"Molar solution" is shorthand for 1 Molar solution I would guess. It's
common to elide items in text/conversation when the missing element is
understood.
If I am walking out the door and say, "Going to the drugstore.", then
clearly, I've omitted the subject, the initial reference to myself, "I".
; Matthias Samwald; W3C HCLSIG hcls
*Subject:* Re: "molar" for concentration
Hi Michael,
I did mean datatype. I do like the MUO / SI solution, but it's strange that
they don't describe "Molar" (much more widely used) along with "mole"? Sure
enough I can &
; lifesci-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jim McCusker
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:58 PM
> > To: Matthias Samwald
> > Cc: Helena Deus; W3C HCLSIG hcls
> > Subject: Re: "molar" for concentration
> >
> > In general, you really want to be able
to:public-semweb-
> lifesci-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jim McCusker
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:58 PM
> To: Matthias Samwald
> Cc: Helena Deus; W3C HCLSIG hcls
> Subject: Re: "molar" for concentration
>
> In general, you really want to be able to have addition
for Systems Biology
*From:* public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org [mailto:
public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org] *On Behalf Of *Matthias Samwald
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:44 PM
*To:* Helena Deus; W3C HCLSIG hcls
*Subject:* Re: "molar" for concentration
Besides the ontolog
In general, you really want to be able to have additional levels of
qualification. For instance, MUO has the ability to assert units of
measure on n-ary observations, as well as to provide prefUnit
annotations on properties. An ontology that generates property URIs
for every quality and unit of mea
Hello,
What is wrong with the URI I provided?
Take care
Oliver
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Matthias Samwald
wrote:
> Besides the ontologies already mentioned, the unit ontology /
> UO (http://obofoundry.org/cgi-bin/detail.cgi?id=unit) also has a class for
> "mole" and one
Besides the ontologies already mentioned, the unit ontology / UO
(http://obofoundry.org/cgi-bin/detail.cgi?id=unit) also has a class for "mole"
and one for "molar mass unit". But you actually wanted a URI for a datatype so
this (as well as the other ontologies mentioned before) is probably not w
Hello,
UOME has Molar and the URI is http://www.sbpax.org/uome/list.owl#Molar
UOME aims to supply any unit in common usage and on top of that
provides means to define your own units by deriving them from other
units (e.g. more common ones).
More info is here: http://www.sbpax.org/uome
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Helena Deus wrote:
> Hi all,
> Wondering if anyone ever needed/came across a URI for datatype "M" (molar,
> as in 10 M -> 10 Molar).
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molar_concentration
MUO has Mole, and can let you build molar concentration from its other
buildin
13 matches
Mail list logo
