;
linmd.si...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu; Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C];
mscottmarsh...@gmail.com; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; ratnesh.sa...@deri.org
Subject: RE: An HL7 RIM navigation language based on SPARQL?
hi peter,
interesting question and discussion. i definitely agree with david's take on
the que
fesci@w3.org; ratnesh.sa...@deri.org
*Subject:* Re: An HL7 RIM navigation language based on SPARQL?
It's because clinicians will balk at the URIs. The DSL would have the same
logic exaclty but all resource names and URIs would have to be replaced
with obvious business names.
Clinicians compla
A visual representation of the underlying RIM/MIF ontology -- and probably an
equivalent SNOMED ontology -- could be helpful, however not as a "special"
language, but rather as a more friendly view of SPARQL constructs. So, I would
think that a formal RIMQL would be a dead end unless it was a pr
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 19:37 +0200, Jerven Bolleman wrote:
> Is SPARQL too difficult to teach to clinicians?
My opinion:
- Yes. Clinicians should have a GUI with interactive faceted browser /
query builder. ANY query language would be too difficult to teach
clinicians who are not IT specialist
Hi All,
Is SPARQL to difficult to teach to clinicians? I personally think its not.
What is difficult to explain is the data model (especially a HL7 compatible
one.)
Explaining a simple select once they understand triples is easy.
I love_my work = simple sentence = subject predicate object
<
htt
