….)
>>
>>
>>
>> DL Reasoners support datatype reasoning.…
>>
>>
>>
>> The problem with this approach is the combinatorial complexity of
>> authoring the rule base…
>>
>> So for this case, you would need 5C2 rules, i.e., 10
08:38 AM
To
"Kashyap, Vipul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Helen Chen/AMPJB/[EMAIL PROTECTED], public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject
Re: CAP use case - Reasoning on Weighted
Condition and Fuzzy Reasoning?
Nice workaround, Vipul.
I have to agree with you that it has a few probl
rom:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 27, 2006 5:05 AM
*To:* Kashyap, Vipul
*Cc:* public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Subject:* RE: CAP use case - Reasoning on Weighted Condition and Fuzzy
Reasoning?
Hi, Vipul
Strongly agreed with two p
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Kashyap, Vipul wrote:
1. Lack of explanation capabilities: A key feature for clinical decision
support is that physicians like to get
explanations for the recommendations proposed by the system.
Well, I'd argue that the recommendations are the accompanying literature
L PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: CAP use case - Reasoning on Weighted Condition and Fuzzy
Reasoning?
Hi, Chimezie
Yes, let's discuss in detail of possible approa
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: CAP use case -
Reasoning on Weighted Condition and Fuzzy Reasoning?
Hi, Chimezie
Yes,
let's discuss in detail of possible approaches at our F2F meeting next week.
I
was also considering something similar to your follo
Hi, Chimezie
Yes, let's discuss in detail of possible
approaches at our F2F meeting next week.
I was also considering something similar
to your following proposal. But one obvious drawback of this approach
is that the weights you calculated or assigned are very much local context
dependent, al
