Hi
Conversions of SNOMED CT to OWL may be of interest.
Indeed existing conversions of SNOMED CT use EL++, which may shortly
become a new 'profile' of OWL 2 that is, a sublanguage of the
standard.
Though less expressive than OWL DL, EL++ seems enough for SNOMED CT.
In particular it includes pr
Hi Christine,
EL++, which may shortly
become a new 'profile' of OWL 2 that is, a sublanguage of the
standard.
That's really interesting to hear, and would be a very welcome
development!!!
I have to admit I was not aware of these effort to allow OWL 1.1 etc.
to contain EL++ as a subl
On 7/24/08 2:22 PM, "Kashyap, Vipul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this is a great suggestion. And more interestingly, the drug ontology
> mapping
> work we are doing in the COI task could be a concrete use case for this
> conversion.
> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/ClinicalObservationsInter
Hello John,
On 7/24/08 1:35 PM, "John Madden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Chime,
>
> Thanks for coming up with this project task proposal relating to
> conversion of legacy terminologies to OWL/RDF, it's very exciting.
No problem. And BTW, I've added a Wiki for this particular task propo
Jyoti,
Thanks for the reference. I agree the paper makes some good points.
A promising alternative to deal with legacy graph-based formalisms
with hierarchies and otherwise sparse axiomatization (of which SNOMED
is one example) and still provide "upward mobility" to OWL is the
RDFS(FA) pro
> I really like your idea of picking a specific subdomain, like drug
> terminology, and using that to test out the pitfalls/possibilities.
>
> (Actually, I think very domain-specific ontolgies have, as a
> rule, the
> strongest likelihood of short-term practical utility.)
I think this is
