Re: RE: RE: [BioRDF] URI Resolution

2007-02-12 Thread samwald
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote: > I'm curious why you are treating this case so differently from the > case of finding information about an information resource. I > assume it is because with information resources you are only > interested in information from that in

RE: RE: [BioRDF] URI Resolution

2007-02-11 Thread Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
> From: Jonathan Rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Doing HTTP operations on an information resource, while abstractly > similar to answering SPARQL queries relating to it (in either case you > are learning something), seems to have a different feel given present > technology. The protocol used

Re: RE: [BioRDF] URI Resolution

2007-02-09 Thread Jonathan Rees
Doing HTTP operations on an information resource, while abstractly similar to answering SPARQL queries relating to it (in either case you are learning something), seems to have a different feel given present technology. The protocol used is HTTP and the stuff you get has types (e.g. image, PDF) t

RE: RE: [BioRDF] URI Resolution

2007-02-09 Thread Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> In your view, how would one find > >> information (or represent the information needed to find > >> information) about a non-informationresource > > I think parallel querying of Sparql endpoints could be an > interesting solution. . . . . I'm curious why you ar

Re: RE: [BioRDF] URI Resolution

2007-02-08 Thread samwald
>> In your view, how would one find >> information (or represent the information needed to find >> information) about a non-informationresource I think parallel querying of Sparql endpoints could be an interesting solution. To get additional information about a non-information resource (say, a