On Jun 11, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
3) How are information resources (e.g. the very abstract ‘database
entry’, or the slightly less abstract ‘XML document associated
with a database entry’) best represented in BFO-friendly ontologies?
In my most recent revision, I line [
> "Evidence" is important, but is complex. If evidence is from
> collection of facts, then exactly how do those facts provide the
> evidence (there are many types of analyses you can do on raw data to
> produce evidence). So evidence is a function of the facts, the
> analysis method, the method o
On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 22:20 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Reviewing the Banff demo ontology infrastructure
> 1) What relations do we use to connect a biological entity with artificial
> entities describing it, e.g. ‘protein records’, ‘sequence records’, ‘Pubmed
> records’?
I've been using t
At 09:43 PM 6/10/2007, Kashyap, Vipul wrote:
Matthias,
Thanks for the well organized e-mail, This is clearly one area where
the HCLSIG
community can provide some feedback. Chimezie had similar constructs
related to
"Patient Records" in his POMR. Let's try to distill out some issues so that
Matthias,
Thanks for the well organized e-mail, This is clearly one area where the HCLSIG
community can provide some feedback. Chimezie had similar constructs related to
"Patient Records" in his POMR. Let's try to distill out some issues so that
HCLSIG/BIONT can give some feedback on this:
1. S
Matthias,
I think you raise some very important points for tomorrow's discussion (and I'm
sure this will need more than one call to address them sufficiently). It would
be great if you could try and deal with just a few of of the most important
relations (some which you noted already), rather
