In the context of neuroscience, I hope things like "long-term depression"
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-term_depression) won't get the system
confused. By the way, in mammalian phenotype ontology, there is a term called
"reduced long-term depression"
-Kei
Quoting "Kashyap, Vipul" <[EMAIL PR
> Why can't we let the doctor just type "left femur fracture" and
> decompose this into fracture (site = femur, laterality = left). There
> is a lot of debate on pre vs post co-ordination but very little work
> to actually bridge the two paradigms... either at acquisition time or
> post-hoc (such
>There is an interesting trade-off between post-coordinated and pre-
>coordinated
>vocabularies in the clinical context.
>
>For instance if you have the following concept fracture (site =
femur,
>laterality = left) this can be used in two contexts:
>- In a search and exploration context, where pos
tenberg; Matthias Samwald; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
> Subject: Re: SenseLab note: some updates
>
> Hi Vipul,
>
> Take the snomed term "Alzheimer's disease" (AD), for example.
> One axis
> may be used to indicate the progression of the disease. For example
ies to be a
post-coordinated terminology, but in
reality it is partially
pre-coordinated and partially post-coordinated.
Cheers,
---Vipul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kei Cheung
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 12:51 PM
To: Alan Ruttenberg
, but in
reality it is partially
pre-coordinated and partially post-coordinated.
Cheers,
---Vipul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:public-semweb-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kei Cheung
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 12:51 PM
To: Alan Ruttenberg
Cc: Matthias Sa
nated terminology, but in
reality it is partially
pre-coordinated and partially post-coordinated.
Cheers,
---Vipul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:public-semweb-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kei Cheung
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 12:51 PM
To: Alan Ruttenberg
Cc: Ma
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kei Cheung
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 12:51 PM
To: Alan Ruttenberg
Cc: Matthias Samwald; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: SenseLab note: some updates
Sounds to me like an ontology exercise
nberg
> Cc: Matthias Samwald; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
> Subject: Re: SenseLab note: some updates
>
>
> Sounds to me like an ontology exercise. For example, pre-coordinated
> approach (knowledgebase) vs. post-coordinated approach
> (knowledge base)?
> May not be a g
Sounds to me like an ontology exercise. For example, pre-coordinated
approach (knowledgebase) vs. post-coordinated approach (knowledge base)?
May not be a good analogy since I'm not an ontology expert. :-)
However, I wonder to what extent these two ontology approaches have been
(or have not
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22knowledge+base%
22&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search : 1,030,000
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?
q=knowledgebase&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search : 11,300
http://www.google.com/search?q=103+%2F+1130&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 :
~91:1
Not really a fair fight ;-)
-Alan
On May
Knowledge base is generally written as two words. Try a google fight
on scholar.google.com.
-Alan
On May 13, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Matthias Samwald wrote:
I have made some small updates to the draft SenseLab conversion
document based on feedback from members of the group. See
http://www.w3.
12 matches
Mail list logo
