On 06/11/2007, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter,
>
> > From: Peter Ansell
> > [ . .. . ]
> > Suppose two people come up with slightly different, but mutually
> > useful, definitions at the same time and, before an authority has
> > declared them to be the same
Peter,
> From: Peter Ansell
> [ . .. . ]
> Suppose two people come up with slightly different, but mutually
> useful, definitions at the same time and, before an authority has
> declared them to be the same, want to use both of the definitions in
> queries, and advertise them so they can be used
On 05/11/2007, Jonathan Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear HCLS list - I haven't put the draft out for general review, but
> am planning to do so tomorrow.
> My reason for waiting is past experience of "draft fatigue" - most
> people will only read one draft of something. If you're one of
Jonathan,
I regret not mentioning this in the first place, but thanks for the
time and effort to put the note together. It makes debating it so much
easier ;-)
In general, I think my objections are related to philosophical
recommendations that are difficult or impossible to follow. I would
expec
Dear HCLS list - I haven't put the draft out for general review, but
am planning to do so tomorrow.
My reason for waiting is past experience of "draft fatigue" - most
people will only read one draft of something. If you're one of those
people please wait a while for the dust to settle.
