Thanks again AJ for the work you are doing.I think you are correct here - it can be useful to provide a classification scheme defining the variety of approaches we can envision researchers will use to formally specify experiment-related semantic information.Just to be clear - the terms I presented
Title: Message
Hi
All,
"On one end, some researchers want a
quick and easy way to share an experiment, e.g. simply decompose an experiment
to hypothesis, data, results, procedure, protocols used, who did it, what
project it belongs to, etc."
Even
stronger, at a high level this is what a
I believe AJ has a valid point. As somewhat of an outsider to the biomedical field, but a practioner in other scientific informatics fields, I am aware of numerous other efforts to develop ontologies, or their equivalent, for describing an experiemtn and its results. For example, in the area of
