Dear All,
One of my colleagues has pointed out this discussion, and I am following
the discussion with great interest. Unfortunately it seems we missed the
meeting, however I read the minutes and the related discussions.
In an FP7 Project named SALUS [1] , we are addressing very similar
prob
On 22 Aug 2012, at 02:07, Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C] wrote:
> As we dug a bit deeply into this issue and figured out how to define these
> mappings in OWL and make them available at run-time as RDF, it became clear
> that being able to publish -- or at least have the publishable form be
> ac
ERM@KAIPERM
cc da...@dbooth.org, helena.d...@deri.org,
kerstin.l.forsb...@gmail.com, linmd.si...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu,
mea...@mail.nih.gov,
mscottmarsh...@gmail.com, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, ratnesh.sa...@deri.org
Subject Re: seeks input on Study Data Exchange
Standards An alternative approach
tha
d...@deri.org, kerstin.l.forsb...@gmail.com,
linmd.si...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu, mea...@mail.nih.gov,
mscottmarsh...@gmail.com, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org,
ratnesh.sa...@deri.org
Subject
Re: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards An alternative approach
thanks Peter.
Just so I'm clear - and m
any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them.
> Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
> *David Booth *
>
> 08/21/2012 02:33 PM
> To
> Peter Hendler/CA/KAIPERM@KAIPERM
> cc
> mscottmarsh...@gmail.com, helena.d...@deri.org,
> kerstin.l.forsb...@gmail.com, linmd.si...@m
servables,
> Procedures" so those pre existing SNOMED hierarchies are in general "what"
> things.
>
>
>
> *
> NOTICE TO RECIPIENT:* If you are not the intended recipient of this
> e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or
received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently
delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or
saving them. Thank you.
Conor Dowling
08/21/2012 11:54 PM
To
David Booth
cc
Peter Hendler/CA/KAIPERM@KAIPE
/CA/KAIPERM@KAIPERM, helena.d...@deri.org,
> kerstin.l.forsb...@gmail.com, linmd.si...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu,
> mea...@mail.nih.gov, mscottmarsh...@gmail.com,
> public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, ratnesh.sa...@deri.org
> Subject
> Re: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards An alternat
,
public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, ratnesh.sa...@deri.org
Subject
Re: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards An alternative approach
apologies if this is a tangent but why is what's identified as
"extensional" particular to health-care? "Who" said/observed/found/acte
Mead,
Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C]; mscottmarsh...@gmail.com;
public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; ratnesh.sa...@deri.org
Subject: Re: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards An alternative
approach
apologies if this is a tangent but why is what's identified as
"extensional" particular to health-ca
l.com; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; ratnesh.sa...@deri.org
Subject: Re: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards An alternative
approach
apologies if this is a tangent but why is what's identified as "extensional"
particular to health-care? "Who" said/observed/found/
apologies if this is a tangent but why is what's identified as
"extensional" particular to health-care? "Who" said/observed/found/acted
"What", "When" and "Where" is surely a general notion. Does it need a
health-care model or ontology? Yes, particular findings or observations or
procedures can be
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 15:11 -0700, peter.hend...@kp.org wrote:
> [ . . . ] Can you use RDF in a closed world way when ever you want,
> or is it only safe when the model you're dealing with, like FHIR,
> really is known to be closed world?
>
I think so, provided that you understand that you are m
..@mcrf.mfldclin.edu,
mea...@mail.nih.gov, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, ratnesh.sa...@deri.org
Subject
Re: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards An alternative approach
Hi Peter,
Very nice observations! I wholeheartedly agree with your basic thesis,
but I would quibble with one o
Hi Peter,
Very nice observations! I wholeheartedly agree with your basic thesis,
but I would quibble with one off-hand remark . . .
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 08:47 -0700, peter.hend...@kp.org wrote:
> Sorry I didn't make the meeting but just looked at the minutes.
>
> We (Kaiser) do use the Ontol
, copying, or otherwise using or
disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently
delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or
saving them. Thank you.
Kathrin Dentler
0
Hi Peter,
Just my two cents: Having read your white paper, I find your
separation into the "What", i.e. the terminological model
(intensional), and the "When, Who, Where, Why", i.e. the
context/information model (extensional), very useful and intuitive.
In y
rstin.l.forsb...@gmail.com"
, "linmd.si...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu"
, "mscottmarsh...@gmail.com"
, "public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org"
, "ratnesh.sa...@deri.org"
Subject
RE: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards An alternative approach
forsb...@gmail.com;
linmd.si...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu; mscottmarsh...@gmail.com;
public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; ratnesh.sa...@deri.org
Subject: RE: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards An alternative
approach
Actually design-time and run-time is even better than what I said. Let's use
t
uot;
, "linmd.si...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu"
, "mscottmarsh...@gmail.com"
, "public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org"
, "ratnesh.sa...@deri.org"
Subject
RE: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards An alternative approach
Hi Peter --
Agree --and I think I un
emweb-lifesci@w3.org; ratnesh.sa...@deri.org
Subject: RE: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards An alternative
approach
We are in fact talking about two different things.
If you are talking about how to more easily create new FHIR resources, and to
assure their correct mapping to the RIM th
in.l.forsb...@gmail.com;
linmd.si...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; Sahay,
Ratnesh; Eric Prud'hommeaux
Subject: RE: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards An alternative
approach
Hi Peter --
I haven't read the notes of today's discussion, but since I was the one
that su
t; ,
"linmd.si...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu" ,
"public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org" ,
"ratnesh.sa...@deri.org" , "Eric Prud'hommeaux"
Subject
RE: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards An alternative approach
Hi Peter --
I haven't read the notes of toda
d.si...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu; Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C];
public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; ratnesh.sa...@deri.org
Subject: Re: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards An alternative
approach
Sorry I didn't make the meeting but just looked at the minutes.
We (Kaiser) do use the Ontology feature
Sorry I didn't make the meeting but just looked at the minutes.
We (Kaiser) do use the Ontology features of SNOMED extensively and have a
different take on how it should be done.
Specifically we would not advocate for example, putting FHIR in RDF or
OWL. What we've fount to be simple, useful,
25 matches
Mail list logo
