RE: using OBO in owl format to describe data

> I am not familiar with the OBO, from what I just read from the > OBO spec, I think OBO does have term like "intersection_of", > "union_of", "disjoint_from". From I can see now, the > translation should be syntactic for most, but not all, > concepts. For those concepts that there is any OWL equiv

RE: using OBO in owl format to describe data

--Joanne, > Having had many surprises in learning how the open world > works and how OWL works > I'm curious to know how this is handled. I have not yet taken on > the task to learn > OBO as I hope not have to. I would like to feel confident > that I can convert a file into OWL and use it,

Re: [SPAM] Re: using OBO in owl format to describe data

Joanne and all. Many of the questions in the mailing list show that we are at a "stariting point" of "more intellectual Web" . Suppose there are some foundations which must be taken into account as well. Look at the "To keep abreast of the 21st Century" paper - http://ototsky.mgn.ru/it/21abreast.h

Re: using OBO in owl format to describe data

Xiaoshu, You raise the issue of open vs closed world, which has been on my mind whenever any translation to OWL comes up. I have ahead of me some databases in OBO that I will be looking to convert to OWL. I intend to build constructs that enable reasoners to tell me new things about the

RE: using OBO in owl format to describe data

-- Mary, > so I should define properties for my data so I can then state > ( pardon my awkwardness with the shorthand syntax ): The notation is notation 3 (with a few variants). Its terse syntax make it much easier to communicate among humans. You can learn the language syntax starting from h

Re: using OBO in owl format to describe data

so I should define properties for my data so I can then state ( pardon my awkwardness with the shorthand syntax ): @prefix gene: . gene:Y rdfs:subClassOf obo:Term . _:x a gene:Y . rdfs:label"my frog gene" mystuff:sequence "atgcgga" mystuff:chrom

Re: using OBO in owl format to describe data

Hi Mary I invite you to submit your comments to the obo-format list, where we are close to finalising a new version of the obof->owl mapping http://www.bioontology.org/wiki/index.php/OboInOwl:Main_Page On Oct 10, 2006, at 10:08 PM, Mary Montoya wrote: I have a question about using the Op

RE: using OBO in owl format to describe data

--Mary, I am not familiar with OBO, but what you are suggesting is actually what should be avoided in RDF. RDF is based on open world assumption. But to have one superclass for the purpose of enforcing certain annotation property is a closed world thinking in Object Oriented world. In your cas