ED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: wiki page for
semantic web ROI
Hi, Roger Good story. I
would like to "dream" about one more important benefit that might come out of
semantic web: the re-usable knowledgebase. In your calculation, &q
by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/20/2006 01:36 PM
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED], public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
cc
Subject
RE: wiki page for semantic web ROI
It seems to me that Davide's case study can pretty easily be made into
an ROI story titled something like "Computer Aided Literature
It seems to me that Davide's case study can pretty easily be made into
an ROI story titled something like "Computer Aided Literature Searches".
I'm obviously not the one to do this for real, since I don't know enough
about the subject matter to talk about it convincingly, but let me take
a crack a
Thanks Alan,
This is certainly the kind of benefits story that has ROI potential.
The pieces I would still need to collect are:
1) What was the approximate savings in time and cost by doing this using
OWL vs. the more traditional way
2) What are some of the later realized costs of using error
Hi Eric,
In a discussion with Vipul, he thought the work that Jeremy Zucker and
I did:
http://karma.med.harvard.edu/wiki/Debugging_the_bug
might be of interest to the ROI subgroup. In that work we discuss a
data integration example implemented in OWL that exposed quite a few
errors in the
