This may also be an interesting way of intersecting microarray (mageml)
and semantic web (rdfa) ...
-Kei
Ivan Herman wrote:
I am sorry if I come into this thread very late. Additionally to what
Ralph just said, the RDFa distiller running on the W3C site:
http://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/
; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: Can RDFa be used on XML: pharma information
This may also be an interesting way of intersecting
microarray (mageml)
and semantic web (rdfa) ...
-Kei
Ivan Herman wrote:
I am sorry if I come into this thread very late. Additionally to what
This is probably technically possible - but you'd need to process a lot
of complex mage-ml to get out some quite simple information - there's a
node-edge sample processing graph, plus all the external data files in
there - mage-ml is mostly tags and the files are large. We've moved
internally
I am sorry if I come into this thread very late. Additionally to what
Ralph just said, the RDFa distiller running on the W3C site:
http://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/
should actually work with an arbitrary XML file, although only SVG is
'announced' there (which is probably my mistake). If there is
Thanks for everyone for their useful help yesterday.
I am deferring the RDFa parts, and instead will concentrate on making
page-level RDF descriptions that may be useful for data links for the
outside world. (The HTML pages are now full of ids, hproduct
microformats class, HTML rel, and
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Rick Jellifferjelli...@allette.com.au wrote:
I am working on improving the semweb markup on an Australian government
Department of Health and Aging website, which has HTML and XML versions of
the medicines allowed for prescription and the amount the government
Hi Rick,
I think adding parts of RDFa into your XML without turning the whole XML
into some kind of XHTML document will not help much.
If you want to use RDFa and make your data part of the Semantic Web, why
don't you add more RDFa to your current HTML pages? I see that they do not
contain
So there is still no convenient way to mark up existing XML as RDF? It
was a showstopper 10 years ago but I kind of expected there would have
been some progresssigh
(Like I said, it has different info from the HTML so adding RDFa to the
HTML won't work; also the XML has existing
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Rick Jellifferjelli...@allette.com.au wrote:
So there is still no convenient way to mark up existing XML as RDF? It was
a showstopper 10 years ago but I kind of expected there would have been some
progresssigh
Define 'markup'... you can just embed your
On 23/6/09 11:49, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
So there is still no convenient way to mark up existing XML as RDF? It
was a showstopper 10 years ago but I kind of expected there would have
been some progresssigh
Well, since you didn't seem keen on converting all the XML to RDF I
didn't point you
Dan Brickley wrote:
On 23/6/09 11:49, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
So there is still no convenient way to mark up existing XML as RDF? It
was a showstopper 10 years ago but I kind of expected there would have
been some progresssigh
Well, since you didn't seem keen on converting all the XML to
Egon Willighagen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Rick Jellifferjelli...@allette.com.au wrote:
So there is still no convenient way to mark up existing XML as RDF? It was
a showstopper 10 years ago but I kind of expected there would have been some
progresssigh
Define
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Rick Jellifferjelli...@allette.com.au wrote:
Markup = annotation. Taking existing data and adding stuff to make it more
useful, without disrupting existing uses of that data (and without creating
the size/maintenance issues you get from duplication.)
One of
Hi Rick,
So there is still no convenient way to mark up existing XML as RDF? It
was a showstopper 10 years ago but I kind of expected there would have
been some progress
I rather think that using XML as the default representation for RDF was the
showstopper back then. RDF/XML is not a good
I see that the 2008 draft
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/rdfa-overview
says
RDFa itself is intended to be a technique that allows for adding
metadata to any (XML) markup document, including SMIL, RSS, SVG, MathML,
etc. Note, however, that in the current state, RDFa is being defined
only
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Rick Jellifferjelli...@allette.com.au wrote:
I see that the 2008 draft
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/rdfa-overview
says
RDFa itself is intended to be a technique that allows for adding metadata
to any (XML) markup document, including SMIL, RSS, SVG,
Egon Willighagen wrote:
The problem here is to define what attributes your XML will use to
define the RDFa hooks... what attributes will define a new subject,
the predicate, and how you define the object...
Yes, we lose the html:base element and html:link, but why would we lose
the
Hello,
A nice example of the traps of data linking. The data seems to say
that Einstein was born in the Federal Republic of Germany. In fact, he
was born before the FRG was founded.
Take care
Oliver
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Rick Jellifferjelli...@allette.com.au wrote:
Egon Willighagen wrote:
Namespace... to solve this, you could do instead:
my:book xhtml:about=urn:ISBN:0091808189 xhtml:typeof=biblio:book
xhtml:property=dc:title
Canteen Cuisine
/my:book
where the prefix xhtml would be bound to the namespace belonging to
XHTML+RDFa...
At 10:48 PM 6/23/2009 +1000, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
I see that the 2008 draft
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/rdfa-overview
says
RDFa itself is intended to be a technique that allows for adding metadata to
any (XML) markup document, including SMIL, RSS, SVG, MathML, etc. Note,
however,
20 matches
Mail list logo
