Re: Reviewing the Banff demo ontology infrastructure

2007-06-17 Thread Alan Ruttenberg
On Jun 11, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: 3) How are information resources (e.g. the very abstract ‘database entry’, or the slightly less abstract ‘XML document associated with a database entry’) best represented in BFO-friendly ontologies? In my most recent revision, I line [

RE: Reviewing the Banff demo ontology infrastructure

2007-06-11 Thread Kashyap, Vipul
> "Evidence" is important, but is complex. If evidence is from > collection of facts, then exactly how do those facts provide the > evidence (there are many types of analyses you can do on raw data to > produce evidence). So evidence is a function of the facts, the > analysis method, the method o

Re: Reviewing the Banff demo ontology infrastructure

2007-06-11 Thread Chimezie Ogbuji
On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 22:20 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Reviewing the Banff demo ontology infrastructure > 1) What relations do we use to connect a biological entity with artificial > entities describing it, e.g. ‘protein records’, ‘sequence records’, ‘Pubmed > records’? I&#

RE: Reviewing the Banff demo ontology infrastructure

2007-06-11 Thread Daniel Rubin
At 09:43 PM 6/10/2007, Kashyap, Vipul wrote: Matthias, Thanks for the well organized e-mail, This is clearly one area where the HCLSIG community can provide some feedback. Chimezie had similar constructs related to "Patient Records" in his POMR. Let's try to distill out some issues so that

RE: Reviewing the Banff demo ontology infrastructure

2007-06-10 Thread Kashyap, Vipul
Matthias, Thanks for the well organized e-mail, This is clearly one area where the HCLSIG community can provide some feedback. Chimezie had similar constructs related to "Patient Records" in his POMR. Let's try to distill out some issues so that HCLSIG/BIONT can give some feedback on this: 1. S

RE: Reviewing the Banff demo ontology infrastructure

2007-06-10 Thread Eric Neumann
eers, Eric -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sun 6/10/2007 4:20 PM To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org Subject: Reviewing the Banff demo ontology infrastructure Reviewing the Banff demo ontology infrastructure Alan did a great job at coordinating previousl

Reviewing the Banff demo ontology infrastructure

2007-06-10 Thread samwald
Reviewing the Banff demo ontology infrastructure Alan did a great job at coordinating previously separate ontologies of several participants of the HCLSIG into a coherent infrastructure for the Banff demo. As we all agree, we should try to keep the momentum going and keep the pace of ontology