Thanks,
>
> -Guoqian
>
>
>
> From: Lloyd McKenzie
> Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 1:10 PM
> To: David Booth
> Cc: "Jiang, Guoqian, M.D., Ph.D." , "
> public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org" , "
> i...@lists.hl7.org" , Eric Prud'h
quot;i...@lists.hl7.org<mailto:i...@lists.hl7.org>"
mailto:i...@lists.hl7.org>>, Eric Prud'hommeaux
mailto:e...@w3.org>>, "Solbrig, Harold R."
mailto:solbrig.har...@mayo.edu>>
Subject: Re: San Antonio Summary & Agenda for Tue Jan 27 HL7 ITS / W3C HCLS
I don't really understand what this means. Value set binding is fully
defined in FHIR already (in the Profile, DataElement an Questionnaire
resources). How that gets represented when we convert Profile to OWL is
very much in-scope. Similarly, Profile, DataElement and Questionnaire are
all mechan
Hi Guoqian,
On 01/27/2015 12:35 PM, Jiang, Guoqian, M.D., Ph.D. wrote:
Hi, David,
In the conference call this morning, we agreed to make FHIR common model
for data element management and value set binding as a separate project
outside FHIR Ontology project. It is a good timing as we at Mayo are
Hi, David,
In the conference call this morning, we agreed to make FHIR common model
for data element management and value set binding as a separate project
outside FHIR Ontology project. It is a good timing as we at Mayo are
actively working on producing a Semantic Web-based metadata repository
in
AGENDA FOR TUESDAY Jan 27:
* FHIR Ontology Requirements
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Ontology_Requirements
SUMMARY OF SAN ANTONIO MEETINGS:
We had a very good meeting with the rest of the HL7 ITS work group in
San Antonio. We reviewed the purpose and goals of the RDF subgroup,
dis
