Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
A distinct name would be nice when you consider that my first reaction
was to go with the AWWW/httprange-14-friendly term 'non-information
source'. However, the combination of the fact the httprange-14
finding is being rewritten [1] (yes!) and Roy Fielding's response [2]
/me is supposed to be on vacation but can't seem to stay away from
mailing lists threads :)
Xiaoshu Wang wrote:
> The URN Bijian/Chimezie/and others are talking about, at least from the given
> use cases, is intended for a URI that has no associated transportation
> protocol whatsoever. Perha
