Tim,
I’m aware of the SWAN project, which is very
inspirational. The
knowledge lifecycle task force you proposed is also very visionary. With your experience and leadership in this
area, I’m looking forward to your guidance or suggestion as to how we
can
initiate a task within the HCLS task f
AJThere isn't such a tool to my knowledge. However you might like to look at what we're doing with SWAN, which encompasses exactly what you propose. We have focused on Alzheimer Research for pragmatic reasons and because we believe in working with the domain scientists close to us. We also believ
Larry & Group
I personally see the key elements here as placement of data
publication in semantic relationship to *all the other elements of
the knowledge lifecycle*, and supporting use cases that scientists
would actually use, rather than semantic structure of the published
data itself.
Hi Tim, Thanks. I thought you would understand exactly I'm talking
about because my proposed task is for the task force you had proposed.
You gave a grant picture, and my intention is to have a specific,
well-defined task to get the ball rolling. I'm hoping someone else will
also see the value of t
I appreciate all the comments. Let me first make myself
clear so that I won't get beaten up again! I'm trying to solve a specific
problem or unmet need here. When I don't see a satisfactory solution, I make a
proposal. If the feedback says there is a good solution existed already, then
my job is
Larry Hunter wrote:
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 22:53 -0700, AJ Chen wrote:
Proposed task: Distributed self-publishing of experiments
1. Ontology for publishing projects and experiments. There are
some domain-specific ontologies, such as microarray e
My favorite quote was "being the first is important, being the best is
irrelevant" (Karp)
Such is life...
M
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 16:28 -0400, Eric Neumann wrote:
> Ahh, I stand corrected, and probably was confused with the Mark - Larry
> role switching
>
> Somewhere there was even menti
Ahh, I stand corrected, and probably was confused with the Mark - Larry
role switching
Somewhere there was even mention of Thomas Jefferson as well...
Eric
On May 9, 2006, at 3:19 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote:
Indeed - my notes say that it was Mark Musen who was advocating to "let
1000 flo
Indeed - my notes say that it was Mark Musen who was advocating to "let
1000 flowers bloom" :-) while Larry was taking the more conservative
track...
M
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 13:14 -0600, Larry Hunter wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 14:53 -0400, Eric Neumann wrote:
>
> > I seem to remember at an
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 14:53 -0400, Eric Neumann wrote:
> I seem to remember at an Ontology panel at ISMB last year in Detroit
> you were advocating the Anarchists approach to ontologies ; )
You misremember! I started off by saying how this was going to be the
first time in my entire life t
Hmmm
I seem to remember at an Ontology panel at ISMB last year in Detroit
you were advocating the Anarchists approach to ontologies ; )
Eric
--- Larry Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 13:48 -0400, Tim Clark wrote:
>
> > I would also claim that data is *not
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 13:48 -0400, Tim Clark wrote:
> I would also claim that data is *not useful* unless linked to and
> explicated by a publication by those who derived it. You know:
> "Hypothesis", "Materials and Methods", "Interpretation", etc. all the
> stuff you find in peer-reviewed
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 22:53 -0700, AJ Chen wrote:
> Proposed task: Distributed self-publishing of experiments
> 1. Ontology for publishing projects and experiments. There are
> some domain-specific ontologies, such as microarray experiment
> ontology, already existed today.
I think that any system to allow self-publishing of data would need
to be developed in concert with actual working scientists and subject
entirely to their needs and concerns, i.e. their use cases. So on
that basis it may be presuming too much to suggest as Matthias does
that simply aggr
> Deliverables:
> Ontology for publishing projects and experiments. There are
> some domain-specific ontologies, such as microarray experiment
> ontology, already existed today. This task is intended to develop
> a general purpose ontology for describing projects and
> experiments in su
I'm very excited about the vision described in the Knowledge
Cycle task force. It's my believe that the semantic web technologies will
eventually empower individual researchers to share and exchange research
information in new way that was not possible before. I would like to propose a
specific t
16 matches
Mail list logo
