RE: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case

2011-01-10 Thread Daniel Rubin
w3.org; John F. Madden; Vasiliy Faronov; Toby Inkster; Peter DeVries; Tim Berners-Lee; Anita de Waard; Maryann Martone Subject: Re: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case Dear Daniel, I am very interested in revising the material you have related to

Re: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case

2011-01-10 Thread Maryann Martone
ryann Martone Subject: Re: best practice relation for linking to image/machine- opaque docs? biomedical use case Hi Scott, For referring to a portion of an image, let me point you to work in my group done in collaboration with HCLS Scientific Discourse Task, UCSD, Elsevier, and one of

Re: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case

2011-01-10 Thread Paolo Ciccarese
Marshall > > Cc: HCLS IG; public-...@w3.org; Daniel Rubin; John F. Madden; Vasiliy > Faronov; > > Toby Inkster; Peter DeVries; Tim Berners-Lee; Paolo Ciccarese; Anita de > Waard; > > Maryann Martone > > Subject: Re: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-o

RE: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case

2011-01-10 Thread Daniel Rubin
Faronov; > Toby Inkster; Peter DeVries; Tim Berners-Lee; Paolo Ciccarese; Anita de Waard; > Maryann Martone > Subject: Re: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? > biomedical use case > > Hi Scott, > > For referring to a portion of an image, let me poin

Re: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case

2011-01-10 Thread Tim Clark
Inkster; Peter DeVries; Tim Berners-Lee; Paolo Ciccarese; >> Anita de Waard; Maryann Martone >> Subject: Re: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque >> docs? biomedical use case >> >> Hi Scott, >> >> For referring to a portion of an ima

Re: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case

2011-01-10 Thread Paolo Ciccarese
; > To: M. Scott Marshall > > Cc: HCLS IG; public-...@w3.org; Daniel Rubin; John F. Madden; Vasiliy > > Faronov; Toby Inkster; Peter DeVries; Tim Berners-Lee; Paolo Ciccarese; > > Anita de Waard; Maryann Martone > > Subject: Re: best practice relation for linking to image/m

RE: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case

2011-01-10 Thread Michael Miller
im Berners-Lee; Paolo Ciccarese; > Anita de Waard; Maryann Martone > Subject: Re: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque > docs? biomedical use case > > Hi Scott, > > For referring to a portion of an image, let me point you to work in my > group done in

Re: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case

2011-01-10 Thread Tim Clark
Hi Scott, For referring to a portion of an image, let me point you to work in my group done in collaboration with HCLS Scientific Discourse Task, UCSD, Elsevier, and one of the major pharmas. Paolo Ciccarese is the main author, and this work is based on the earlier W3C project Annotea. AO, An

RE: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case

2011-01-10 Thread Michel_Dumontier
> In Health Care and Life Science domains, image data is a common form > of data under discussion so a best practice for referring to an image > or to an (extractable) feature *within* an image would cover a > fundamental need in biomedicine to point to 'raw' data as evidence (as > well as giving

Re: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case

2011-01-10 Thread M. Scott Marshall
[Scott dusts off old use case and pulls from the shelf. Adjusts subject of thread. Was: best practice for referring to PDF] In Health Care and Life Science domains, image data is a common form of data under discussion so a best practice for referring to an image or to an (extractable) feature *wit