Thanks again AJ for the work you are doing.I think you are correct here - it can be useful to provide a classification scheme defining the variety of approaches we can envision researchers will use to formally specify experiment-related semantic information.Just to be clear - the terms I presented
ut available to) and search for interesting correlations.
my
further 2c,
Michael
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AJ
ChenSent: Friday, July 07, 2006 12:43 AMTo:
public-semweb-lifesci@w3.orgSubject: how to deal with diffe
ds. The link to that article is http://www.infointl.com/pdf/developing_using_standards.pdf, in the sections at the end .
-Original Message- From: AJ Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Jul 7, 2006 3:42 AM To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org Subject: how to deal with different requirement
All,
>From the discussions so far, I see a whole spectrum of needs for publishing experiment
information. On one end, some researchers want a quick and easy
way to share an experiment, e.g. simply decompose an experiment to
hypothesis, data, results, procedure, protocols used, who did it, what
pro
