i'm willing to comprise to "should", as it it is generally seen as a good
practice to use void:inDataset for linking data items to datasets. We can
bring this discussion to the semantic-web mailing list, if you want to
additional feedback.
m.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Jerven Bolleman wr
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Michel Dumontier wrote:
> Hi Jerven,
>
> First: Bio2RDF's current datasets are listed here:
>
> http://bio2rdf.org/datasets
>
> as i mentioned, and has been presented [1] those that are in Bio2RDF
> release 2 have provenance. e.g.
> http://bio2rdf.org/geneid:123
>
We load the entire dataset into a named graph, then use the graph URI for
provenance. I'm with Jerven in that we don't want to add void:inDataset links
in the source data for the many million resources we index, however, I have no
problem including this information when you request information a
Hi Jerven,
First: Bio2RDF's current datasets are listed here:
http://bio2rdf.org/datasets
as i mentioned, and has been presented [1] those that are in Bio2RDF
release 2 have provenance. e.g.
http://bio2rdf.org/geneid:123
(we did not provide updates to uniprot, genbank, refseq, pubmed in releas
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Michel Dumontier wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Jerven Bolleman wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Alasdair J G Gray <
>> alasdair.g...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 3 Jun 2013, at 17:51, Michel Dumontier
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Jerven Bolleman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Alasdair J G Gray <
> alasdair.g...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 3 Jun 2013, at 17:51, Michel Dumontier
>> wrote:
>>
>> About void:inDataset I personally don't like it. I suspect it would cost
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Alasdair J G Gray <
alasdair.g...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> On 3 Jun 2013, at 17:51, Michel Dumontier
> wrote:
>
> About void:inDataset I personally don't like it. I suspect it would cost
>> me a 13% growth in triple size for negligible benefits. This also mean
On 3 Jun 2013, at 17:51, Michel Dumontier wrote:
> About void:inDataset I personally don't like it. I suspect it would cost me a
> 13% growth in triple size for negligible benefits. This also means that the
> dataset description starts to affect the data. Although I could only present
> this
