good morning;
On 2014-10-30, at 00:28, Rob Vesse wrote:
> John
>
> […]
>
> There is some mention of numeric overflow in the XPath specification but I
> can't see anything specific about the circumstances in which it should occur.
the xpath language specifications[1,2] both “depend on" the re
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Steve Harris wrote:
> Section 17.3 of the 1.1 query spec (sorry, can't link directly to it, on
> my phone, but open the spec and search for "promotion") says that it does
> type promotion (inherited from XPath F&O), and links to the description at
> http://www.w3.
it should
occur.
Rob
From: John Yates
Date: Tuesday, 28 October 2014 04:59
To:
Cc: Arthur Keen
Subject: typing and overflow
Resent-From:
Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 21:06:55 +
> Coming from the world of statically typed languages I am trying figure out
> whether SPARQL
Section 17.3 of the 1.1 query spec (sorry, can't link directly to it, on my
phone, but open the spec and search for "promotion") says that it does type
promotion (inherited from XPath F&O), and links to the description at
http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#promotion
> On 28 Oct 2014, at 11:59, John
Coming from the world of statically typed languages I am trying figure out
whether SPARQL specifies a model of type determination within expressions.
C and C++ have a set of integral promotions and a rule that - in the
absence of a prototype - float gets promoted to double. Those rules then
imply
