On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 23:04:01 +0200, Simon Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't understand the construction If the user agent allows the
specification of a proxy. What does it mean to allow the specification
of a proxy? What is the specification of a proxy? Or am I just
misreading it?
Your attention to detail is much appreciated!
On Mon, 07 May 2007 17:05:59 +0200, Innovimax SARL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Implementations should support some version of XML. If they don't
support some version of XML responseXML must always be null. [XML]
[XMLNS]
]]
Does it mean a conformant
On 5/7/07, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your attention to detail is much appreciated!
I had to ! All the rest is ok :-) !
On Mon, 07 May 2007 17:05:59 +0200, Innovimax SARL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Implementations should support some version of XML. If they don't
support
I agree that it seems strange to have an XMLHttpRequest that does not
support XML at all !!
On 5/7/07, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 7, 2007, at 10:59 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2007 19:38:15 +0200, Innovimax SARL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it
On Tuesday, May 8, 2007, 12:11:38 AM, Innovimax wrote:
IS I agree that it seems strange to have an XMLHttpRequest that
IS does not support XML at all !!
As others have commented - XMLHttpRequest. Apart from the fact that
its unrelated to XML, not restricted to HTTP and not restricted to
On May 7, 2007, at 4:43 PM, Jon Ferraiolo wrote:
Maciej,
Maybe it's OK for the XHR spec itself to not require XML support,
but instead have other higher-level document format specs such as
HTML5 and/or some future version of SVG require that
implementations support not only XHR but also
