Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On May 14, 2007, at 9:26 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
* Anne van Kesteren wrote:
It was added for compatibility with WebKit. I don't really feel strongly
about it, ...
Excellent, I then look forward to a proposal that Jonas and I do not
regard as inappropriate.
I do
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> The question we should be examining is whether [text/xsl] is actually
> used in practice. If it is, then the right course of action is to get it
> registered with the IETF (and presumably marked deprecated). If it
> isn't, then we can safely req
* Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>I don't personally feel strongly about this particular issue (I don't
>think it is common for sites to send text/xsl as a MIME type on the
>wire), but since when is the fact that someone "regard[s] [it] as
>inappropriate" a valid reason to change something? Should
On 5/14/07, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Defining particular behavior when a type is seen is not the same as
standardizing it, in my opinion.
Disagree, since MIME types are used to route messages to code with
particular behaviors. However, I personally don't feel too strongly
On May 14, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Robert Sayre wrote:
On 5/14/07, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Personally I don't think lack of registration is a particularly
strong reason not to define handling for a particular MIME type.
At the very least, the W3C/IETF liasons should discuss
On 5/14/07, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Personally I don't think lack of registration is a particularly
strong reason not to define handling for a particular MIME type.
At the very least, the W3C/IETF liasons should discuss this. It is
exceedingly bad manners to squat a on pa
On May 14, 2007, at 9:26 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
* Anne van Kesteren wrote:
It was added for compatibility with WebKit. I don't really feel
strongly
about it, ...
Excellent, I then look forward to a proposal that Jonas and I do not
regard as inappropriate.
I don't personally feel s
* Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>It was added for compatibility with WebKit. I don't really feel strongly
>about it, ...
Excellent, I then look forward to a proposal that Jonas and I do not
regard as inappropriate.
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str
On Thu, 10 May 2007 17:21:30 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
* Anne van Kesteren wrote:
If one UA treats Content-Type:text/foobar as XML and another UA does not
and a site starts relying on text/foobar being treated as XML we have a
problem.
We have very many problems of
On Wed, 09 May 2007 00:49:56 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anne: was there a reason 'text/xsl' was included other than "IE does
it"? Or is it known to actually break sites?
A Contributor from WebKit implementing XMLHttpRequest requested it to be
included for compatibility
10 matches
Mail list logo
