On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Eric Lawrence
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked, in part:
I am also not sure if a DNS rebound cross-domain XHR with
POST or some other method can do anything that you can't
do with a cross-domain form submission. You can
Hi Jonathan,
SVG 1.2 Tiny is an a state where we cannot easily introduce new features,
definitely not a feature as complex as GUI widgets.
With the editable text feature of SVG 1.2t it will, however, be a lot
easier to do text-input in SVG. Opera 9.5 beta already supports this
features. It may
Erik,
it may be I misunderstood the spec, which in this case I had read...
the example given:
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/examples/textArea02.svg
which is simple to understand does not provide anything similar to:
html form: action or method, which aywk do not require script.
and it is
~:'' ありがとうございました。 wrote:
which is simple to understand does not provide anything similar to:
html form: action or method, which aywk do not require script.
and it is in this sense that I feel the SVGt1.2 spec is not acceptable.
Wasn't the design philosophy of SVG the XML one, i.e. you mix
Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But not exactly identical, since forms can't be used to POST XML content with
a proper MIME type cross-domain.
You're right-- setting an arbitrary request content-type is a capability not
present in HTML forms today. While we believe that this is a
On 2008-03-17 14:29:54 -0700, Sunava Dutta wrote:
If removed, all XDR POST requests could be sent with:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Servers would then be flexible in interpreting the data in the
higher-level format they expect (JSON, XML, etc).
Why text/plain,
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:29:54 +0100, Sunava Dutta
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are many threats against a cross-domain communication mechanism,
so we believe the simplicity of XDR makes it more suitable than
attempting to plumb cross-domain capabilities into the existing XHR
object. In
On Mar 17, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Sunava Dutta wrote:
Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But not exactly identical, since forms can't be used to POST XML
content with a proper MIME type cross-domain.
You're right-- setting an arbitrary request content-type is a
capability not present
Sunava Dutta wrote:
Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But not exactly identical, since forms can't be used to POST XML content with a
proper MIME type cross-domain.
You're right-- setting an arbitrary request content-type is a capability not
present in HTML forms today. While we
