[ElementTraversal] Remarks on http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/ElementTraversal/publish/ElementTraversal.html?rev=1.10

to explain why this has been added to the original SVG proposal Please add informative references to DOM Level 2 Range Traversal and DOM Level 3 Core Regards, Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356

[XHR2] Remarks in version Editor's draft 2 August 2007

to say =) ==Typo == s/Unauthorised/Unauthorized/ s/anologously/analogously/ s/behaviour/behavior/ s/reponse/response/ Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris

Re: [Network Communication API] Remarks on the current draft

, Innovimax SARL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/network-api/network-api.html?rev=1.2content-type=text/html;%20charset=iso-8859-1 [various typos and editorial errors] Thanks Mohamed, I will publish a new editors' draft in a few minutes

[Network Communication API] Remarks on the current draft

Please update it to April 2007 -- s/coresponding/corresponding/ Regards, Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €

[XMLHTTPRequest] Remarks

/ == References == 1) you seem to use , editor or , editors which is good but you haven't done it in all references 2) sometimes you use W3C or World Wide Web Consortium 3) you don't have to prefix with RFC 2119: the tiltle of the spec to be consistent with other refs Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL

Re: The XMLHttpRequest Object comments

On 5/8/07, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 08 May 2007 01:16:57 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 7, 2007, at 3:11 PM, Innovimax SARL wrote: I agree that it seems strange to have an XMLHttpRequest that does not support XML at all !! I don't

Re: The XMLHttpRequest Object comments

On 5/7/07, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2007 19:38:15 +0200, Innovimax SARL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [[ There is a case-insensitive match of strings s1 and s2 if after upercasing both strings (by mapping a-z to A-Z) they are identical. ]] s1 and s2 because

Re: The XMLHttpRequest Object comments

On 5/7/07, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your attention to detail is much appreciated! I had to ! All the rest is ok :-) ! On Mon, 07 May 2007 17:05:59 +0200, Innovimax SARL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Implementations should support some version of XML. If they don't support

Re: The XMLHttpRequest Object comments

I agree that it seems strange to have an XMLHttpRequest that does not support XML at all !! On 5/7/07, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 7, 2007, at 10:59 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Mon, 07 May 2007 19:38:15 +0200, Innovimax SARL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does