Yes, we're working on this as we speak. I'll send out a copy once it's ready.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:public-webapps-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arthur Barstow
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 3:46 AM
To: Sunava Dutta
Cc: Marc Silbey; public-webapps
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sunava Dutta [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 2:54 PM
To: Arthur Barstow; ext Jonas Sicking; Marc Silbey
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; public-webapi@w3.org WG (public); [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Eric Lawrence; Chris Wilson; David Ross; Mark Shlimovich (SWI
Try this link instead: http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/xdsecuritywp
From: Sunava Dutta
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:24 PM
To: Sunava Dutta; Arthur Barstow; ext Jonas Sicking; Marc Silbey; [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; public-webapi@w3.org
send(1) doesn’t work. The reason being we don’t cast an argument
to a string. This is also not defined in the spec.
Thanks!
From: Sunava Dutta
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 7:47 PM
To: Web API public; IE8 Core AJAX SWAT Team
Subject: Potential bugs identified
Good to have you here Alec!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Alec Berntson
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 10:32 AM
To: Charles McCathieNevile; Michael Champion
Cc: public-webapi@w3.org; Alec Berntson
Subject: RE: Microsoft Corp. has
be sending out the paper on Tuesday evening or Wednesday the latest.
Thanks for waiting.
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 5:06 AM
To: ext Jonas Sicking; Sunava Dutta
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; public-webapi@w3.org WG (public); public
harder to
make changes).
Thanks!
--
Sunava Dutta
Program Manager (AJAX) - Developer Experience Team, Internet Explorer
One Microsoft Way, Redmond WA 98052
TEL# (425) 705-1418
FAX# (425) 936-7329
be good
for the WG to discuss whether we want a separate list.[Sunava Dutta]
[Sunava Dutta] I think Doug's point is that there are more parties (and
industries) that are affected by this. Of course, working with other browser
vendors AND other invested parties is important.
I would strongly
Inline...
-Original Message-
From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 5:45 AM
To: Julian Reschke
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak; Sunava Dutta; Web API WG (public)
Subject: Re: XHR LC comments
On Sat, 17 May 2008 14:23:24 +0200, Julian Reschke [EMAIL
Inline...
-Original Message-
From: Maciej Stachowiak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 2:04 AM
To: Julian Reschke
Cc: Sunava Dutta; Anne van Kesteren; Web API WG (public)
Subject: Re: XHR LC comments
On May 17, 2008, at 1:03 AM, Julian Reschke wrote
points below:
This message is not attempting to set forth in detail all the
objections we have had; Sunava will deliver that in a concise form.
Can you give us a ballpark ETA on this?
[Sunava Dutta] Sure, I'm compiling this as we speak. I expect this to be ready
and available to the Web API
Comments inline. Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 8:12 AM
To: Sunava Dutta
Cc: public-webapi@w3.org; Gideon Cohn; Ahmed Kamel; Zhenbin Xu; Doug
Stamper
Subject: Re: XHR LC Draft Feedback
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03
Ahh, I see my mail client can do that. I just need to make a few changes.
Having a standardized guidance here would be very helpful -:p.
-Original Message-
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 12:34 AM
To: Sunava Dutta
Cc: public-webapi@w3.org; IE8
Julian Reschke wrote:
a) I'm confused about the approach to this document. On the one hand,
we're being told that it can't define anything not already in use (and
that new stuff belongs into XHR2), on the other hand it relies on HTML5,
which is a moving target. It's good that this stuff is being
02, 2008 3:57 AM
To: Sunava Dutta; Eric Lawrence; Chris Wilson
Cc: ext Anne van Kesteren; Web API WG (public); [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Zhenbin Xu;
Gideon Cohn; Sharath Udupa; Marc Silbey
Subject: Seeking XDR versus AC4CSR+XHR2 follow-ups by Microsoft [Was: Re: IE
Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests
that headers
of equivalent function with different names are also submitted for
consideration in this blocked list. (I don't have any that comes to mind
currently).
--
Sunava Dutta
Program Manager (AJAX) - Developer Experience Team, Internet Explorer
One Microsoft Way, Redmond WA 98052
TEL# (425) 705
Agreed. I think it's entirely reasonable to call XDR by its full DOM name,
XDomainRequest.
-Original Message-
From: Stewart Brodie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 3:47 AM
To: Sunava Dutta
Cc: Web API WG (public)
Subject: Re: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR
Message-
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 4:52 AM
To: Sunava Dutta
Cc: Web API WG (public); [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Eric Lawrence; Chris Wilson;
Zhenbin Xu; Gideon Cohn; Sharath Udupa; Doug Stamper; Marc Silbey
Subject: What is Microsoft's intent with XDR vis-à
: IE
Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Sunava Dutta wrote:
IE would like to propose XDR as a new (Rec-track) spec for the Web API
WG. We think there is a place for both implementations within the
charter of the Web API.
I think it would be very bad for the Web
XDR will not participate in HTTPS client authentication, so there is no threat
here.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hallvord R. M.
Steen
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 6:08 PM
To: public-webapi@w3.org
Subject: Question regarding XDR
Message-
From: Maciej Stachowiak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 1:23 PM
To: Eric Lawrence
Cc: Web API WG (public); [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sunava Dutta; Chris Wilson; Zhenbin
Xu; Gideon Cohn; Sharath Udupa; Doug Stamper; Marc Silbey
Subject: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross
Sure Doug. Will try to get this out to you in the mentioned format asap.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Schepers
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 4:37 AM
To: Web API WG (public)
Subject: Re: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests
That would definitely improve readability for us (IE Team) as well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles
McCathieNevile
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 11:02 AM
To: Web API WG (public)
Subject: [XHR] Editorial - labelling sections
That is correct. Thanks Hallvord!
-Original Message-
From: Hallvord R. M. Steen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:18 PM
To: Charles McCathieNevile; Sunava Dutta; Chris Wilson
Cc: public-webapi@w3.org; Gideon Cohn; Zhenbin Xu; Marc Silbey; Ahmed Kamel
Subject
/XMLHttpRequest/.
Adding him and starting a thread so he can communicate with you directly.
Cheers,
--
Sunava Dutta
Program Manager (AJAX) - Developer Experience Team, Internet Explorer
One Microsoft Way, Redmond WA 98052
TEL# (425) 705-1418
FAX# (425) 936-7329
. This reminds me of the DOM L1 vs DOM L0, where the
DOM L1 spec was engineering to include all new functionality over the DOM L0
which was assumed to be baseline interoperable across browsers.
*The thread below has more details and specific instances.
Thanks!
From: Sunava Dutta
Sent: Tuesday
This is fantastic, we took a look at the working draft and it looks great.
The IE team's looking forward to seeing it published!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Anne van Kesteren
Sent: Tue 2/13/2007 1:41 AM
To: Web API WG (public)
Cc: Web API WG
Subject:
27 matches
Mail list logo
