Hi, Ian-
Ian Hickson wrote:
As you say, the WG here just moved from one minority opinion to another
minority opinion. So this isn't a case where Anne's decision was not
representative of the wider community.
You're implying with the term "minority opinion" that there was a
"majority opini
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Doug Schepers wrote:
>
> [...]
I made exactly the point that you did -- you should have an editor who
makes decisions, but can be overriden by a working group when the
decisions are not representative of the community.
As you say, the WG here just moved from one minority o
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, João Eiras wrote:
So, it's a matter
of personal opinion that "names suck".
My argument is not that the names suck. My argument is that there is not
concensus, that the decision process was opaque and behind-closed-doors,
The discussion was not done
