On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:07:36 +0100, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>
> Note that the WHATWG version of this draft is in heavy flux; there are
> hundreds of outstanding comments on it. Is the intent that this
> specification replace the
e Wilson
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles
> McCathieNevile
> Sent: den 7 mars 2007 08:27
> To: web API
> Subject: Network API editor's draft
>
>
> Hi folks.
>
> Thanks to Gorm and the W
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> >
> > Note that the WHATWG version of this draft is in heavy flux; there are
> > hundreds of outstanding comments on it. Is the intent that this
> > specification replace the WHATWG version?
>
> Hmm. It is intended to be used by a similar aud
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:27:50 +1100, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note that the WHATWG version of this draft is in heavy flux; there are
> hundreds of outstanding comments on it. Is the intent that this
> specification replace the WHATWG version?
Hmm. It is intended to be used by a si
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>
> Thanks to Gorm and the WHATWG, we have
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/network-api/network-api.html
Note that the WHATWG version of this draft is in heavy flux; there are
hundreds of outstanding comments on it. Is the inte
Hi folks.
Thanks to Gorm and the WHATWG, we have
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/network-api/network-api.html
Comments and brickbats welcome
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[
